• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血清生物标志物可预测经活检证实的 NASH 生活方式干预 1 年后肝纤维化的变化。

Serum biomarkers can predict a change in liver fibrosis 1 year after lifestyle intervention for biopsy-proven NASH.

机构信息

Department of Hepatology, National Institute of Gastroenterology, Havana, Cuba.

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

Liver Int. 2017 Dec;37(12):1887-1896. doi: 10.1111/liv.13480. Epub 2017 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1111/liv.13480
PMID:28544769
Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The dynamic response of serum fibrosis biomarkers to histological changes within the liver following lifestyle intervention (LI) is unknown. We explored relationships between changes in serum biomarkers and liver fibrosis in NASH patients undergoing LI.

METHODS

Paired liver biopsies were performed in 261 NASH patients to assess fibrosis change after 1 year of LI. We explored the utility of serum fibrosis markers to predict changes in hepatic fibrosis and developed and internally validated a model for predicting fibrosis improvement in patients with baseline fibrosis.

RESULTS

Regression, stabilization and worsening of fibrosis occurred in 51 (20%), 165 (63%) and 45 (17%) patients respectively. By multivariable analysis, change in HbA1c (OR, 0.39, P<.01), platelets (OR, 1.22, P<.01) and NFS (OR, 0.27, P<.01), as well as ALT normalization (OR, 9.7, P<.01) were independently associated with fibrosis improvement, whereas change in platelets (OR, 0.96, P<.01), and NFS (OR, 1.8, P<.01) as well as ALT normalization (OR, 0.21, P<.01) were linked to fibrosis progression. A model, including change in HbA1c, platelet and ALT normalization, was significantly more accurate (AUC of 0.96, 95% CI, l0.94-0.99) than NFS, FIB-4 and APRI for predicting fibrosis improvement. Using a threshold of ≥0.497, positive and negative predictive values were 94% (95% CI, 84-98) and 91% (95% CI, 81-96) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Change in NFS, platelets and ALT normalization are associated with change in liver fibrosis after 1 year of LI. A model including change in HbA1c, platelet and ALT normalization discriminated patients with fibrosis improvement significantly better than other biomarkers.

摘要

背景与目的

生活方式干预(LI)后血清纤维化生物标志物对肝脏组织学变化的动态反应尚不清楚。我们探讨了接受 LI 的 NASH 患者血清生物标志物变化与肝纤维化之间的关系。

方法

对 261 例 NASH 患者进行了配对肝活检,以评估 LI 后 1 年的纤维化变化。我们探讨了血清纤维化标志物预测肝纤维化变化的效用,并为基线纤维化患者建立并内部验证了一种预测纤维化改善的模型。

结果

51 例(20%)、165 例(63%)和 45 例(17%)患者的纤维化分别出现缓解、稳定和进展。多变量分析显示,HbA1c(OR,0.39,P<.01)、血小板(OR,1.22,P<.01)和 NFS(OR,0.27,P<.01)的变化以及 ALT 正常化(OR,9.7,P<.01)与纤维化改善独立相关,而血小板(OR,0.96,P<.01)和 NFS(OR,1.8,P<.01)以及 ALT 正常化(OR,0.21,P<.01)的变化与纤维化进展相关。包括 HbA1c、血小板和 ALT 正常化变化的模型对预测纤维化改善的准确性明显高于 NFS、FIB-4 和 APRI(AUC 为 0.96,95%CI,0.94-0.99)。使用阈值≥0.497,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 94%(95%CI,84-98)和 91%(95%CI,81-96)。

结论

NFS、血小板和 ALT 正常化的变化与 LI 后 1 年的肝纤维化变化相关。包括 HbA1c、血小板和 ALT 正常化变化的模型比其他生物标志物更好地鉴别出纤维化改善的患者。

相似文献

1
Serum biomarkers can predict a change in liver fibrosis 1 year after lifestyle intervention for biopsy-proven NASH.血清生物标志物可预测经活检证实的 NASH 生活方式干预 1 年后肝纤维化的变化。
Liver Int. 2017 Dec;37(12):1887-1896. doi: 10.1111/liv.13480. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
2
Relationship between three commonly used non-invasive fibrosis biomarkers and improvement in fibrosis stage in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.三种常用非侵入性纤维化生物标志物与非酒精性脂肪性肝炎患者纤维化分期改善的关系。
Liver Int. 2019 May;39(5):924-932. doi: 10.1111/liv.13974. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
3
Serum cytokeratin-18 fragment levels as noninvasive marker of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in the chilean population.血清细胞角蛋白-18片段水平作为智利人群非酒精性脂肪性肝炎的无创标志物。
Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Jun-Jul;40(6):388-394. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
4
The evaluation of hepatic fibrosis scores in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.非酒精性脂肪性肝病患儿肝纤维化评分的评估
Dig Dis Sci. 2015 May;60(5):1440-7. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3494-7. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
5
Performance of Plasma Biomarkers and Diagnostic Panels for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis and Advanced Fibrosis in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.血浆生物标志物和诊断试剂盒在 2 型糖尿病患者非酒精性脂肪性肝炎和肝纤维化中的应用性能。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Feb;43(2):290-297. doi: 10.2337/dc19-1071. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
6
Noninvasive Serum Fibrosis Markers are Associated with Coronary Artery Calcification in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.非酒精性脂肪性肝病患者的无创性血清纤维化标志物与冠状动脉钙化相关。
Gut Liver. 2019 Nov 15;13(6):658-668. doi: 10.5009/gnl18439.
7
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease - histological scoring systems: a large cohort single-center, evaluation study.非酒精性脂肪性肝病——组织学评分系统:一项大型队列单中心评估研究。
APMIS. 2017 Nov;125(11):962-973. doi: 10.1111/apm.12742.
8
Liver fibrosis markers of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.非酒精性脂肪性肝炎的肝纤维化标志物
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jun 28;21(24):7427-35. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i24.7427.
9
Noninvasive biomarkers in predicting nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and assessing liver fibrosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.预测非酒精性脂肪性肝炎及评估肝纤维化的非侵入性生物标志物:系统评价与荟萃分析
Panminerva Med. 2021 Dec;63(4):508-518. doi: 10.23736/S0031-0808.20.04171-3. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
10
Elafibranor, an Agonist of the Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-α and -δ, Induces Resolution of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis Without Fibrosis Worsening.依洛前列素,一种过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体-α和-δ激动剂,可在不加重肝纤维化的情况下诱导非酒精性脂肪性肝炎消退。
Gastroenterology. 2016 May;150(5):1147-1159.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.01.038. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-Invasive Serum Markers of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Fibrosis: Potential Tools for Detecting Patients with Cardiovascular Disease.非酒精性脂肪性肝病纤维化的非侵入性血清标志物:检测心血管疾病患者的潜在工具。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Sep 24;25(9):344. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2509344. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
The Burden of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis: A Systematic Review of Epidemiology Studies.非酒精性脂肪性肝炎的负担:流行病学研究的系统评价
Gastro Hep Adv. 2022 Jul 19;1(6):1049-1087. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2022.06.016. eCollection 2022.
3
Deep learning for predicting fibrotic progression risk in diabetic individuals with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease initially free of hepatic fibrosis.
深度学习用于预测初始无肝纤维化的代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病糖尿病个体的纤维化进展风险。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 5;10(13):e34150. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34150. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
4
Effects of luseogliflozin on suspected MASLD in patients with diabetes: a pooled meta-analysis of phase III clinical trials.利格列汀治疗糖尿病疑似 MASLD 患者的效果:III 期临床试验的汇总荟萃分析。
J Gastroenterol. 2024 Sep;59(9):836-848. doi: 10.1007/s00535-024-02122-x. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
5
Optimizing surveillance of low-risk metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease using transient elastography.应用瞬时弹性成像技术优化低危代谢相关脂肪性肝病的监测。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Apr 1;36(4):476-481. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002713. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
6
Suppressed Histone H3 Lysine 18 Acetylation Is Involved in Arsenic-Induced Liver Fibrosis in Rats by Triggering the Dedifferentiation of Liver Sinusoidal Endothelial Cells.组蛋白H3赖氨酸18乙酰化抑制通过触发肝窦内皮细胞去分化参与大鼠砷诱导的肝纤维化。
Toxics. 2023 Nov 13;11(11):928. doi: 10.3390/toxics11110928.
7
Canagliflozin and Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: New Insights From CANVAS.卡格列净与糖尿病患者代谢相关脂肪性肝病:来自 CANVAS 的新见解。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Oct 18;108(11):2940-2949. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad249.
8
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors: Harms or Unexpected Benefits?钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2(SGLT2)抑制剂:危害还是意外获益?
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Apr 10;59(4):742. doi: 10.3390/medicina59040742.
9
Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors: Benefits Versus Risk.钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2(SGLT2)抑制剂:益处与风险
Cureus. 2023 Jan 18;15(1):e33939. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33939. eCollection 2023 Jan.
10
GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.GLP-1 受体激动剂在非酒精性脂肪性肝病中的应用:当前证据与未来展望。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 15;24(2):1703. doi: 10.3390/ijms24021703.