• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理专业学生和教育工作者在共同构建临床护理领导力学习活动中的经历:一项定性研究与发展研究。

Experiences of nursing students and educators during the co-construction of clinical nursing leadership learning activities: A qualitative research and development study.

作者信息

Ha Laurence, Pepin Jacinthe

机构信息

Center for innovation in nursing education, Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Aug;55:90-95. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.05.006
PMID:28544985
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Student voice posits that students' unique perspectives on teaching and learning can be used in conjunction with those of educators to create meaningful educational activities.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to describe nursing students' and educators' experiences during the co-construction of educational activities involving clinical nursing leadership.

DESIGN

Qualitative research and development model.

SETTING

The study was conducted at a French-Canadian nursing faculty that provides a 3-year undergraduate program.

PARTICIPANTS

Five undergraduate nursing students, four nursing educators, and the principal investigator formed the co-construction team.

METHODS

Data collected included all documents (written and audio) related to the co-construction process: three 2-hour team meetings, PI's fieldnotes and a focus group discussion that occurred once the co-construction process was completed. Thematic analysis was performed guided by Paillé and Muchielli's (2010) method.

RESULTS

Data analysis revealed two interrelated themes: (1) unique, purposeful collaboration and (2) change that makes a difference. A space described as safe, without hierarchy and that included the "right" people helped the team achieve their objective of creating new educational activities on clinical nursing leadership. The two new learning activities developed by the team were perceived as useful for future nursing students. At the individual level, team members appreciated how co-construction helped them understand teaching and learning from new perspectives.

CONCLUSIONS

A structured, efficient co-construction process contributed to positive changes in the nursing program and participants. Additional research is required to enhance understanding of the factors that facilitate and hinder student-educator collaboration outside the classroom.

摘要

背景

学生声音理论认为,学生对教学的独特观点可与教育工作者的观点相结合,以创造有意义的教育活动。

目的

本研究旨在描述护理专业学生和教育工作者在共同构建涉及临床护理领导力的教育活动过程中的经历。

设计

定性研究与发展模型。

地点

该研究在一所提供三年制本科课程的法裔加拿大护理学院进行。

参与者

五名本科护理专业学生、四名护理教育工作者和首席研究员组成了共同构建团队。

方法

收集的数据包括与共同构建过程相关的所有文件(书面和音频):三次两小时的团队会议、首席研究员的实地记录以及共同构建过程完成后进行的一次焦点小组讨论。采用帕illé和穆奇埃利(2010年)的方法进行主题分析。

结果

数据分析揭示了两个相互关联的主题:(1)独特、有目的的合作;(2)带来改变的变化。一个被描述为安全、没有等级制度且包含“合适”人员的空间,帮助团队实现了创建关于临床护理领导力的新教育活动的目标。团队开发的两项新学习活动被认为对未来的护理专业学生有用。在个人层面,团队成员赞赏共同构建如何帮助他们从新的角度理解教学。

结论

一个结构化、高效的共同构建过程促成了护理课程和参与者的积极变化。需要进一步研究以加深对促进和阻碍课堂外学生与教育工作者合作的因素的理解。

相似文献

1
Experiences of nursing students and educators during the co-construction of clinical nursing leadership learning activities: A qualitative research and development study.护理专业学生和教育工作者在共同构建临床护理领导力学习活动中的经历:一项定性研究与发展研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Aug;55:90-95. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 15.
2
A phenomenological research study: Perspectives of student learning through small group work between undergraduate nursing students and educators.一项现象学研究:本科护生与教育者之间通过小组工作进行学习的观点。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Sep;68:153-158. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.06.013. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
3
Clinical nursing leadership educational intervention for first-year nursing students: A qualitative evaluation.临床护理领导力教育干预对一年级护理学生的影响:一项定性评估。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2018 Sep;32:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
4
Clinical nurse leaders' and academics' perspectives in clinical assessment of final-year nursing students: A qualitative study.临床护士领导者和学者对本科最后一年护理专业学生临床评估的看法:一项定性研究。
Nurs Health Sci. 2017 Sep;19(3):287-293. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12342. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
5
Perceived challenges of nurse educators while teaching undergraduate nursing students in Pakistan: An exploratory mixed-methods study.巴基斯坦本科护生教学中护理教育者的感知挑战:一项探索性混合方法研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2019 Oct;81:39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.07.002. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
6
"A privilege but also a challenge." Nurse educators' perceptions about teaching fundamental care in a simulated learning environment: A qualitative study.“既是一种特权,也是一项挑战。” 护理教育工作者对在模拟学习环境中教授基础护理的看法:一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jun;29(11-12):2011-2022. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15177. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
7
Nurse Educators Teaching Through the Lens of Transformative Learning Theory.通过变革性学习理论视角进行教学的护士教育工作者。
J Nurs Educ. 2019 Apr 1;58(4):225-228. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20190321-07.
8
"The Child's World": a creative and visual trigger to stimulate student enquiry in a problem based learning module.《儿童世界》:一种创造性的视觉触发因素,用于在基于问题的学习模块中激发学生的探究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2008 Nov;28(8):962-9. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.05.017. Epub 2008 Jul 24.
9
Instructor-Created Activities to Engage Undergraduate Nursing Research Students.教师设计的活动,以吸引本科护理专业研究学生参与。
J Nurs Educ. 2018 Mar 1;57(3):174-177. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20180221-10.
10
Transitioning a bachelor of science in nursing program to blended learning: Successes, challenges & outcomes.将护理学理学学士学位课程转变为混合式学习:成功、挑战与成果
Nurse Educ Pract. 2017 Sep;26:126-133. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2016.10.006. Epub 2016 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Students as co-designers in health professional education: a scoping review.学生作为健康职业教育中的共同设计者:一项范围综述
BMC Med Educ. 2025 May 3;25(1):645. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07110-0.
2
PROTOCOL: Learner-educator co-creation of student assessment in health professional education courses: A scoping review protocol.方案:健康职业教育课程中学习者与教育者共同创建学生评估:一项范围综述方案。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Mar 20;20(2):e1392. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1392. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Exploring stakeholders' experiences in co-creation initiatives for clinical nursing education: a qualitative study.
探索利益相关者在临床护理教育共创举措中的经历:一项定性研究。
BMC Nurs. 2023 Nov 6;22(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01582-5.