Guzmán-Guillén Remedios, Puerto María, Gutiérrez-Praena Daniel, Prieto Ana I, Pichardo Silvia, Jos Ángeles, Campos Alexandre, Vasconcelos Vitor, Cameán Ana M
Area of Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla 41012, Spain.
Marine and Environmental Research Center-CIIMAR/CIMAR, Porto University, Porto 4050-123, Portugal.
Toxins (Basel). 2017 May 23;9(6):175. doi: 10.3390/toxins9060175.
Cyanobacterial toxins, particularly microcystins (MCs) and cylindrospermopsin (CYN), are responsible for toxic effects in humans and wildlife. In order to counteract or prevent their toxicity, various strategies have been followed, such as the potential application of chemoprotectants. A review of the main substances evaluated for this aim, as well as the doses and their influence on cyanotoxin-induced toxicity, has been performed. A search of the literature shows that research on MCs is much more abundant than research on CYN. Among chemoprotectants, antioxidant compounds are the most extensively studied, probably because it is well known that oxidative stress is one of the toxic mechanisms common to both toxins. In this group, vitamin E seems to have the strongest protectant effect for both cyanotoxins. Transport inhibitors have also been studied in the case of MCs, as CYN cellular uptake is not yet fully elucidated. Further research is needed because systematic studies are lacking. Moreover, more realistic exposure scenarios, including cyanotoxin mixtures and the concomitant use of chemoprotectants, should be considered.
蓝藻毒素,尤其是微囊藻毒素(MCs)和柱孢藻毒素(CYN),会对人类和野生动物产生毒性作用。为了对抗或预防它们的毒性,人们采取了各种策略,比如潜在应用化学保护剂。本文对为此目的评估的主要物质,以及剂量及其对蓝藻毒素诱导毒性的影响进行了综述。文献检索表明,关于微囊藻毒素的研究比关于柱孢藻毒素的研究丰富得多。在化学保护剂中,抗氧化化合物是研究最为广泛的,这可能是因为众所周知氧化应激是这两种毒素共有的毒性机制之一。在这一组中,维生素E似乎对两种蓝藻毒素都具有最强的保护作用。对于微囊藻毒素的情况也研究了转运抑制剂,因为柱孢藻毒素的细胞摄取尚未完全阐明。由于缺乏系统研究,还需要进一步研究。此外,应该考虑更现实的暴露场景,包括蓝藻毒素混合物以及化学保护剂的同时使用。