Suppr超能文献

新辅助化疗后膀胱切除术后残留癌患者的肿瘤学结局:病理分期匹配分析。

Oncologic Outcomes for Patients with Residual Cancer at Cystectomy Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Pathologic Stage-matched Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):660-664. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.05.016. Epub 2017 May 22.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

While it has been demonstrated that receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before radical cystectomy (RC) improves survival compared to RC alone, the driving factor for this benefit may be from patients with ypT0 status at surgery. Meanwhile, the implications of having residual urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (rUCB) at RC after NAC are less clear. We therefore evaluated whether survival differed between patients with rUCB at RC after NAC and stage-matched controls who underwent RC alone. Patients who underwent NAC + RC (n = 180) were matched to controls who underwent RC alone (n=324) on the basis of pT and pN stage, margin status, and year of RC. The 5-yr recurrence-free survival (RFS; 90% vs 94%; p=1), cancer-specific survival (CSS; 82% vs 93%; p=0.4), and overall survival (OS; 82% vs 82%; p=0.5) were not significantly different between the NAC and control groups for patients with ypT0N0/pT0N0 disease (n=103). Conversely, among patients with rUCB at RC (n=401), patients who received NAC had significantly worse 5-yr RFS (50% vs 63%; p=0.01), CSS (40% vs 59%; p=0.003), and OS (33% vs 48%; p=0.02). On multivariable analysis for patients with rUCB, NAC receipt remained independently associated with worse RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-2.66; p=0.001), CSS (HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.30-2.52; p<0.001), and OS (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.18-2.08; p=0.002). Limitations include potential for selection bias owing to the retrospective observational design. Thus, while patients who achieve a complete response to NAC have excellent survival outcomes, those with rUCB after NAC have a worse prognosis compared to stage-matched controls undergoing RC alone. It may be worthwhile considering these patients for clinical trials evaluating the role of additional treatments after RC using newer agents while we await further research on predicting which patients achieve ypT0 status from NAC before RC.

PATIENT SUMMARY

On surgical removal of the bladder, patients without residual bladder cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have excellent survival outcomes. However, patients with residual cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and surgery have worse outcomes compared to patients undergoing surgery alone. These patients should therefore be considered for additional treatments after surgery using newer agents while we await further research on predicting which patients will benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy before bladder removal for cancer.

摘要

背景

与单独接受根治性膀胱切除术(RC)相比,新辅助化疗(NAC)后接受 RC 可改善生存,但其获益的驱动因素可能来自于手术时达到ypT0 期的患者。同时,NAC 后 RC 时仍存在尿路上皮癌(rUCB)的影响尚不清楚。因此,我们评估了 NAC 后 RC 时存在 rUCB 的患者与单独接受 RC 的匹配对照患者之间的生存是否存在差异。

方法

根据 pT 和 pN 分期、切缘状态和 RC 年份,对接受 NAC+RC(n=180)的患者与单独接受 RC(n=324)的对照组患者进行匹配。在 ypT0N0/pT0N0 疾病患者(n=103)中,NAC 组和对照组的 5 年无复发生存率(RFS;90% vs 94%;p=1)、癌症特异性生存率(CSS;82% vs 93%;p=0.4)和总生存率(OS;82% vs 82%;p=0.5)无显著差异。相反,在 RC 时存在 rUCB 的患者(n=401)中,接受 NAC 的患者的 5 年 RFS(50% vs 63%;p=0.01)、CSS(40% vs 59%;p=0.003)和 OS(33% vs 48%;p=0.02)显著更差。在 rUCB 患者的多变量分析中,NAC 接受仍然与更差的 RFS(风险比[HR]1.84,95%置信区间[CI]1.28-2.66;p=0.001)、CSS(HR 1.81,95% CI 1.30-2.52;p<0.001)和 OS(HR 1.57,95% CI 1.18-2.08;p=0.002)独立相关。

局限性

由于回顾性观察设计,可能存在选择偏倚的风险。因此,尽管对 NAC 完全有反应的患者具有极好的生存结果,但与单独接受 RC 的匹配对照患者相比,NAC 后存在 rUCB 的患者预后更差。在我们等待进一步研究预测哪些患者在 RC 前接受 NAC 后达到 ypT0 状态之前,考虑对这些患者使用新的药物进行 RC 后额外治疗的临床试验可能是值得的。

患者总结

在接受新辅助化疗后,在手术切除膀胱时没有残留膀胱癌的患者有极好的生存结果。然而,与单独接受手术的患者相比,在新辅助化疗和手术后仍有癌症残留的患者的结局更差。因此,这些患者应考虑在手术后使用新的药物进行额外的治疗,同时我们等待进一步研究预测哪些患者将受益于在癌症切除前进行新辅助化疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验