Oke Oluchi, Sethi Tarsheen, Goodman Stacey, Phillips Sharon, Decker Ilka, Rubinstein Samuel, Concepcion Beatrice, Horst Sarah, Jagasia Madan, Kassim Adetola, Harrell Shelton L, Langone Anthony, Lenihan Daniel, Rawling Kyle T, Slosky David, Cornell Robert Frank
Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Sep;23(9):1473-1477. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.05.020. Epub 2017 May 22.
Light chain amyloidosis (AL) results in tissue deposition of misfolded proteins, causing organ dysfunction. In an era of modern therapies, such as bortezomib, reassessment of the benefit of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) should be considered. In this study, we compared outcomes between patients with AL receiving chemotherapy alone (CT) and those undergoing AHCT. Seventy-four patients with AL were analyzed retrospectively. Two cohorts of patients were studied, those receiving CT (n = 31) and those undergoing AHCT (n = 43). Of the 43 patients in the AHCT cohort, 29 received induction chemotherapy before AHCT, whereas 14 proceeded straight to AHCT without induction therapy. Compared with the CT cohort, patients in the AHCT cohort were younger and had higher ejection fractions, lower brain natriuretic peptide levels, and more severe proteinuria. The majority (87%) of patients in the CT cohort received bortezomib-based treatment. Transplantation-related mortality (TRM) was 7%. Patients receiving AHCT were more likely to achieve complete or very good partial response (P = .048). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were superior in the AHCT cohort (not reached versus 9 months; P < .01 and 74 months versus 8 months; P = .03, respectively). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that improved PFS (hazard ratio, 3.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3 to 11.5; P = .02) and OS (hazard ratio, 5.6; 95% CI, 1.9 to 16; P < .001) were associated with use of AHCT compared with CT. Patients in the AHCT cohort had deeper and longer durations of response, with superior PFS and OS, compared with those in the CT cohort. Despite the limitations of this study, AHCT should be considered for eligible patients with AL at experienced transplantation centers that can offer this therapy with a low risk of TRM.
轻链淀粉样变性(AL)会导致错误折叠的蛋白质在组织中沉积,从而引起器官功能障碍。在硼替佐米等现代疗法的时代,应重新评估自体造血细胞移植(AHCT)的益处。在本研究中,我们比较了单纯接受化疗(CT)的AL患者与接受AHCT的患者的治疗结果。对74例AL患者进行了回顾性分析。研究了两组患者,即接受CT治疗的患者(n = 31)和接受AHCT治疗的患者(n = 43)。在AHCT组的43例患者中,29例在AHCT前接受了诱导化疗,而14例未接受诱导治疗直接进行了AHCT。与CT组相比,AHCT组的患者更年轻,射血分数更高,脑钠肽水平更低,蛋白尿更严重。CT组的大多数患者(87%)接受了基于硼替佐米的治疗。移植相关死亡率(TRM)为7%。接受AHCT的患者更有可能实现完全缓解或非常好的部分缓解(P = 0.048)。AHCT组的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)中位数更优(未达到 vs 9个月;P < 0.01和74个月 vs 8个月;P = 0.03)。多变量分析表明,与CT相比,使用AHCT与改善PFS(风险比,3.86;95%置信区间[CI] 1.3至11.5;P = 0.02)和OS(风险比,5.6;95% CI,1.9至16;P < 0.001)相关。与CT组相比,AHCT组的患者缓解程度更深、持续时间更长,PFS和OS更优。尽管本研究存在局限性,但对于符合条件的AL患者,在能够提供低TRM风险治疗的经验丰富的移植中心,应考虑进行AHCT。