Department of stem cell transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Department of Pediatric, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 Nov;24(11):2197-2203. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.07.010. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
With the availability of immunomodulatory imide drugs (IMiDs) and proteasome inhibitors (PI), most patients with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL) receive induction therapy before autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT). In this study we evaluated the type of induction therapy and its impact on the outcome of auto-HCT in AL. We identified 128 patients with AL who underwent high-dose chemotherapy and auto-HCT at our institution between 1997 and 2013. Patients were divided into 3 groups: no induction, conventional chemotherapy (CC)-based induction (melphalan, steroids), and IMiD/PI-based induction (thalidomide, lenalidomide, or bortezomib). The hematologic response (HR) and organ response were defined according to the established criteria. Median age at auto-HCT was 58 years (range, 35 to 75). Twenty patients (15.5%) received no induction, 25 (19.5%) received CC, and 83 (65%) received IMiDs/PIs. One, 2, or 3 or more organs were involved in 90 (70%), 20 (16%), and 18 (14%) patients, respectively. After auto-HCT 12 of 20 (60%), 15 of 24 (62%), and 72 of 83 (87%) assessable patients achieved HR at 100 days in no induction, CC, and IMiD/PI groups, respectively (P = .001). Organ response at 1 year after auto-HCT was seen in 7 of 18 (39%), 14 of 24 (58%), and 37 of 79 (47%) assessable patients in no induction, CC, and IMiD/PI groups, respectively (P = .3). Achieving a hematologic complete response was associated with a significantly higher probability of achieving an organ response (P = .02). After a median follow-up of 26 months, rates of 2-year progression-free survival were 67%, 56%, and 73% in no induction, CC, and IMiD/PI groups, respectively (P = .07; hazard ratio, .5; 95% confidence interval [CI], .3 to 1.1). Rates of 2-year overall survival were 73%, 76%, and 87% in no induction, CC, and IMiD/PI groups, respectively (P = .05; hazard ratio, .4; 95% CI, .2 to .9). On multivariate analysis a low β-microglobulin (P = .01; hazard ratio, .3; 95% CI, .1 to .7) and induction therapy with IMiD/PI (P = .01; hazard ratio, .3; 95% CI, .1 to .7) were associated with a better overall survival. Induction therapy with either CC or IMiDs/PIs is safe and feasible in selected patients with AL. IMiD/PI-based induction is associated with a longer overall survival compared with patients who received no induction or CC before auto-HCT.
在免疫调节亚酰胺类药物(IMiDs)和蛋白酶体抑制剂(PI)可用的情况下,大多数免疫球蛋白轻链淀粉样变性(AL)患者在接受自体造血干细胞移植(auto-HCT)前接受诱导治疗。在这项研究中,我们评估了诱导治疗的类型及其对 AL 患者 auto-HCT 结局的影响。我们确定了 1997 年至 2013 年间在我们机构接受高剂量化疗和自体 HCT 的 128 名 AL 患者。患者分为 3 组:无诱导、基于常规化疗(CC)的诱导(美法仑、类固醇)和基于 IMiD/PI 的诱导(沙利度胺、来那度胺或硼替佐米)。根据既定标准定义血液学反应(HR)和器官反应。auto-HCT 时的中位年龄为 58 岁(范围为 35 至 75 岁)。20 名患者(15.5%)未接受诱导,25 名患者(19.5%)接受 CC 诱导,83 名患者(65%)接受 IMiD/PI 诱导。90 名(70%)、20 名(16%)和 18 名(14%)患者分别有 1、2 或 3 个或更多器官受累。在 auto-HCT 后 100 天,无诱导、CC 和 IMiD/PI 组分别有 12/20(60%)、15/24(62%)和 72/83(87%)可评估患者达到 HR(P=0.001)。在无诱导、CC 和 IMiD/PI 组中,分别有 7/18(39%)、14/24(58%)和 37/79(47%)可评估患者在 1 年后达到器官反应(P=0.3)。达到血液学完全缓解与达到器官反应的可能性显著增加相关(P=0.02)。在中位随访 26 个月后,无诱导、CC 和 IMiD/PI 组的 2 年无进展生存率分别为 67%、56%和 73%(P=0.07;危险比,0.5;95%CI,0.3 至 1.1)。无诱导、CC 和 IMiD/PI 组的 2 年总生存率分别为 73%、76%和 87%(P=0.05;危险比,0.4;95%CI,0.2 至 0.9)。多变量分析显示,低β-微球蛋白(P=0.01;危险比,0.3;95%CI,0.1 至 0.7)和 IMiD/PI 诱导治疗(P=0.01;危险比,0.3;95%CI,0.1 至 0.7)与更好的总生存率相关。在选择的 AL 患者中,CC 或 IMiDs/PIs 诱导治疗是安全可行的。与接受 auto-HCT 前未接受诱导或 CC 治疗的患者相比,基于 IMiD/PI 的诱导治疗与更长的总生存期相关。