• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜腹主动脉-双股动脉搭桥术前及术后患者自我感知的健康相关生活质量

Patient-perceived health-related quality of life before and after laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass.

作者信息

Kazmi Syed Sh, Krog Anne H, Berge Simen T, Sundhagen Jon O, Sahba Mehdi, Falk Ragnhild S

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases, Oslo University Hospital.

Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo.

出版信息

Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017 May 12;13:169-176. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S134669. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.2147/VHRM.S134669
PMID:28546754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5437970/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In patients operated with laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass (LABFB) for atherosclerotic obstruction in aortoiliac segment, the main focus of the reports published during the last two decades has been morbidity and mortality. The primary objective of this study was to examine the health-related quality of life (HRQL) in these patients before and after LABFB.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty consecutive patients (27 females) with Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II, type D lesions were prospectively included. Short-Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire was used to get information about the HRQL before LABFB and at 1, 3 and 6 months after the operation. Main indication for LABFB was intermittent claudication. Linear mixed-effect models were used to assess changes in HRQL over time. Age, gender, smoking, blood loss, operation time, concomitant operation, the American Society of Anesthesiologists category, length of hospital stay, previous vascular procedures and aorta cross-clamping were used as fixed factors and their impact on the physical components of the SF-36, as well as the summary scores were determined with univariate analysis. Variables with <0.2 were included in the multivariate regression analysis. <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Statistically significant improvement was found in all SF-36 domains as well as in the summary scores after LABFB compared to the preoperative scores. The improvement in scores was substantial already at 1 month and the effect was maintained at 3 and 6 months survey time points. Concomitant operations had a statistically significant negative impact on the physical components of SF-36. Data completeness of item questionnaires was 93% in the whole material. Reliability scale and homogeneity estimates for the eight domains had high internal consistency.

CONCLUSION

Patients operated with LABFB for Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II, type D lesions have reduced HRQL. LABFB leads to substantial and statistically significant improvement in the patients' HRQL, when examined with SF-36. These results need to be replicated by a randomized clinical trial.

摘要

背景

在因主-髂动脉段动脉粥样硬化性梗阻而接受腹腔镜主动脉双股动脉搭桥术(LABFB)的患者中,过去二十年发表的报告主要关注发病率和死亡率。本研究的主要目的是检查这些患者在LABFB术前和术后的健康相关生活质量(HRQL)。

患者与方法

前瞻性纳入50例连续的患有跨大西洋跨学会共识II型D病变的患者(27例女性)。使用简短健康调查问卷36项版(SF-36)来获取LABFB术前以及术后1个月、3个月和6个月时有关HRQL的信息。LABFB的主要指征是间歇性跛行。采用线性混合效应模型评估HRQL随时间的变化。将年龄、性别、吸烟、失血量、手术时间、同期手术、美国麻醉医师协会分级、住院时间、既往血管手术史和主动脉阻断作为固定因素,并通过单因素分析确定它们对SF-36身体成分以及汇总得分的影响。将系数<0.2的变量纳入多因素回归分析。P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

与术前评分相比,LABFB术后所有SF-36领域以及汇总得分均有统计学意义的改善。术后1个月时得分就有显著提高,并且在3个月和6个月的调查时间点效果得以维持。同期手术对SF-36的身体成分有统计学意义的负面影响。整个材料中项目问卷的数据完整性为93%。八个领域的信度量表和同质性估计具有较高的内部一致性。

结论

因跨大西洋跨学会共识II型D病变接受LABFB手术的患者HRQL降低。当采用SF-36进行评估时,LABFB可使患者的HRQL得到显著且具有统计学意义的改善。这些结果需要通过随机临床试验进行验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7d5/5437970/df66830d699d/vhrm-13-169Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7d5/5437970/df66830d699d/vhrm-13-169Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7d5/5437970/df66830d699d/vhrm-13-169Fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient-perceived health-related quality of life before and after laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass.腹腔镜腹主动脉-双股动脉搭桥术前及术后患者自我感知的健康相关生活质量
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017 May 12;13:169-176. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S134669. eCollection 2017.
2
A comparative cohort study of totally laparoscopic and open aortobifemoral bypass for the treatment of advanced atherosclerosis.一项关于完全腹腔镜与开放性主-双股动脉旁路移植术治疗晚期动脉粥样硬化的比较队列研究。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2015 Sep 18;11:541-7. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S92671. eCollection 2015.
3
Quality of Life (QoL) Assessment in the Patients Operated with Either Laparoscopic or an Open Aortobifemoral Bypass for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease (AIOD): 2 Years Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜或开放主动脉-股动脉旁路术治疗主髂动脉阻塞性疾病患者的生活质量评估:一项随机对照试验的 2 年结果。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2022 Feb 19;18:61-71. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S350836. eCollection 2022.
4
Contemporary comparison of aortofemoral bypass to alternative inflow procedures in the Veteran population.退伍军人人群中主动脉股动脉旁路移植术与其他流入道手术的当代比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Dec;64(6):1660-1666. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.05.081. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
5
The learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic aortofemoral bypass grafting for aortoiliac occlusive disease.机器人辅助腹腔镜主动脉-股动脉旁路移植术治疗主髂动脉闭塞性疾病的学习曲线。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Feb;53(2):414-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.09.007. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
6
[Factors determining late patency of aortobifemoral bypass graft].[决定主-双股动脉旁路移植术远期通畅率的因素]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1997 Jan-Feb;125(1-2):24-35.
7
Comparison of laparoscopic and open aortobifemoral bypass in the treatment of aortoiliac disease. Results of a contemporary series (2003-2009).腹腔镜与开放主动脉双股动脉旁路移植术治疗主髂动脉疾病的比较。当代系列研究(2003 - 2009年)结果
Acta Chir Belg. 2012 Jan;112(1):51-8. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2012.11680795.
8
Increasing efficacy of endovascular recanalization with covered stent graft for TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II D aortoiliac complex occlusion.带覆膜支架移植物的血管内再通术治疗《跨大西洋两岸社会间共识II D》型主髂动脉复合体闭塞的疗效提高
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Nov;62(5):1219-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.06.218. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
9
Cost-utility analysis comparing laparoscopic vs open aortobifemoral bypass surgery.比较腹腔镜与开放主动脉双股动脉搭桥手术的成本效用分析。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017 Jun 19;13:217-224. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S138516. eCollection 2017.
10
Laparoscopic versus open approach for aortobifemoral bypass for severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease--a multicentre randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗严重主髂动脉闭塞性疾病的腹主动脉-股动脉旁路术:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012 Jun;43(6):711-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 Mar 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of Life (QoL) Assessment in the Patients Operated with Either Laparoscopic or an Open Aortobifemoral Bypass for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease (AIOD): 2 Years Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜或开放主动脉-股动脉旁路术治疗主髂动脉阻塞性疾病患者的生活质量评估:一项随机对照试验的 2 年结果。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2022 Feb 19;18:61-71. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S350836. eCollection 2022.
2
Health-related quality of life and determinants in North-China urban community residents.华北地区城市社区居民的健康相关生活质量及其决定因素。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Aug 14;18(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01522-w.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Perioperative humoral stress response to laparoscopic versus open aortobifemoral bypass surgery.腹腔镜与开放主动脉双股动脉搭桥手术围手术期的体液应激反应
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2017 Apr;77(2):83-92. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2016.1268264. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
2
Comparison of the acute-phase response after laparoscopic versus open aortobifemoral bypass surgery: a substudy of a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜与开放性主动脉双股动脉搭桥手术后急性期反应的比较:一项随机对照试验的子研究
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2016 Sep 26;12:371-378. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S110600. eCollection 2016.
3
The impact of concomitant procedures during endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair on perioperative outcomes.
Cost-utility analysis comparing laparoscopic vs open aortobifemoral bypass surgery.
比较腹腔镜与开放主动脉双股动脉搭桥手术的成本效用分析。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017 Jun 19;13:217-224. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S138516. eCollection 2017.
血管内腹主动脉瘤修复术中同期手术对围手术期结局的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jun;63(6):1411-1419.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.12.039. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
4
The perioperative effect of concomitant procedures during open infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.开放入路肾下腹主动脉瘤修复术中同期手术的围手术期效果
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Oct;64(4):934-940.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.01.048. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
5
Patient-reported outcome measures in vascular surgery.血管外科中患者报告的结局指标
Semin Vasc Surg. 2015 Jun;28(2):122-33. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
6
A comparative cohort study of totally laparoscopic and open aortobifemoral bypass for the treatment of advanced atherosclerosis.一项关于完全腹腔镜与开放性主-双股动脉旁路移植术治疗晚期动脉粥样硬化的比较队列研究。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2015 Sep 18;11:541-7. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S92671. eCollection 2015.
7
How does subintimal angioplasty compare to transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of femoral occlusive disease?内膜下血管成形术与经腔内血管成形术治疗股动脉闭塞性疾病相比如何?
Int J Surg. 2014;12(4):361-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.01.007. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
8
Comparison of laparoscopic and open aortobifemoral bypass in the treatment of aortoiliac disease. Results of a contemporary series (2003-2009).腹腔镜与开放主动脉双股动脉旁路移植术治疗主髂动脉疾病的比较。当代系列研究(2003 - 2009年)结果
Acta Chir Belg. 2012 Jan;112(1):51-8. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2012.11680795.
9
Laparoscopic versus open approach for aortobifemoral bypass for severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease--a multicentre randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗严重主髂动脉闭塞性疾病的腹主动脉-股动脉旁路术:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012 Jun;43(6):711-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
10
Assessment of functional status and quality of life in claudication.跛行患者的功能状态和生活质量评估。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 May;53(5):1410-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.11.092. Epub 2011 Feb 18.