• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜与开放性主动脉双股动脉搭桥手术后急性期反应的比较:一项随机对照试验的子研究

Comparison of the acute-phase response after laparoscopic versus open aortobifemoral bypass surgery: a substudy of a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Krog Anne H, Sahba Mehdi, Pettersen Erik M, Sandven Irene, Thorsby Per M, Jørgensen Jørgen J, Sundhagen Jon O, Kazmi Syed Ss

机构信息

Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo; Department of Vascular Surgery, Division of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Diseases, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo.

Department of Vascular Surgery, Østfold Central Hospital, Fredrikstad.

出版信息

Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2016 Sep 26;12:371-378. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S110600. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.2147/VHRM.S110600
PMID:27713633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5045228/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Minimally invasive surgical techniques have been shown to reduce the inflammatory response related to a surgical procedure. The main objective of our study was to measure the inflammatory response in patients undergoing a totally laparoscopic versus open aortobifemoral bypass surgery. This is the first randomized trial on subjects in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a substudy of a larger randomized controlled multicenter trial (Norwegian Laparoscopic Aortic Surgery Trial). Thirty consecutive patients with severe aortoiliac occlusive disease eligible for aortobifemoral bypass surgery were randomized to either a totally laparoscopic (n=14) or an open surgical procedure (n=16). The inflammatory response was measured by perioperative monitoring of serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-8, and C-reactive protein (CRP) at six different time points.

RESULTS

The inflammatory reaction caused by the laparoscopic procedure was reduced compared with open surgery. IL-6 was significantly lower after the laparoscopic procedure, measured by comparing area under the curve (AUC), and after adjusting for the confounding effect of coronary heart disease (=0.010). The differences in serum levels of IL-8 and CRP did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

In this substudy of a randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and open aortobifemoral bypass surgeries, we found a decreased perioperative inflammatory response after the laparoscopic procedure measured by comparing AUC for serum IL-6.

摘要

目的

微创外科技术已被证明可减少与手术相关的炎症反应。我们研究的主要目的是测量接受全腹腔镜与开放主动脉双股动脉搭桥手术患者的炎症反应。这是该人群中首个针对受试者的随机试验。

患者与方法

这是一项更大规模随机对照多中心试验(挪威腹腔镜主动脉手术试验)的子研究。连续30例符合主动脉双股动脉搭桥手术条件的严重主髂动脉闭塞性疾病患者被随机分为全腹腔镜手术组(n = 14)或开放手术组(n = 16)。通过在六个不同时间点围手术期监测血清白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、IL-8和C反应蛋白(CRP)来测量炎症反应。

结果

与开放手术相比,腹腔镜手术引起的炎症反应减轻。通过比较曲线下面积(AUC)并校正冠心病的混杂效应后,腹腔镜手术后IL-6显著降低(P = 0.010)。IL-8和CRP血清水平的差异未达到统计学意义。

结论

在这项比较腹腔镜与开放主动脉双股动脉搭桥手术的随机对照试验的子研究中,我们发现通过比较血清IL-6的AUC,腹腔镜手术后围手术期炎症反应降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f73/5045228/12a2a6bdf02a/vhrm-12-371Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f73/5045228/ea2af84d8038/vhrm-12-371Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f73/5045228/12a2a6bdf02a/vhrm-12-371Fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f73/5045228/ea2af84d8038/vhrm-12-371Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1f73/5045228/12a2a6bdf02a/vhrm-12-371Fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of the acute-phase response after laparoscopic versus open aortobifemoral bypass surgery: a substudy of a randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜与开放性主动脉双股动脉搭桥手术后急性期反应的比较:一项随机对照试验的子研究
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2016 Sep 26;12:371-378. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S110600. eCollection 2016.
2
Cost-utility analysis comparing laparoscopic vs open aortobifemoral bypass surgery.比较腹腔镜与开放主动脉双股动脉搭桥手术的成本效用分析。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017 Jun 19;13:217-224. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S138516. eCollection 2017.
3
Comparison of laparoscopic and open aortobifemoral bypass in the treatment of aortoiliac disease. Results of a contemporary series (2003-2009).腹腔镜与开放主动脉双股动脉旁路移植术治疗主髂动脉疾病的比较。当代系列研究(2003 - 2009年)结果
Acta Chir Belg. 2012 Jan;112(1):51-8. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2012.11680795.
4
Perioperative humoral stress response to laparoscopic versus open aortobifemoral bypass surgery.腹腔镜与开放主动脉双股动脉搭桥手术围手术期的体液应激反应
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2017 Apr;77(2):83-92. doi: 10.1080/00365513.2016.1268264. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
5
Laparoscopic versus open approach for aortobifemoral bypass for severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease--a multicentre randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗严重主髂动脉闭塞性疾病的腹主动脉-股动脉旁路术:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012 Jun;43(6):711-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
6
Hand-assisted laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass grafting.手辅助腹腔镜主动脉双股动脉旁路移植术。
J Vasc Surg. 2000 Jun;31(6):1142-8. doi: 10.1067/mva.2000.106950.
7
Totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass surgery in the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease or abdominal aortic aneurysms - a systematic review and critical appraisal of literature.全腹腔镜主动脉双股动脉搭桥手术治疗主髂动脉闭塞性疾病或腹主动脉瘤——文献的系统评价与批判性分析
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017 May 18;13:187-199. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S130707. eCollection 2017.
8
The learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic aortofemoral bypass grafting for aortoiliac occlusive disease.机器人辅助腹腔镜主动脉-股动脉旁路移植术治疗主髂动脉闭塞性疾病的学习曲线。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Feb;53(2):414-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.09.007. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
9
Operative results and outcome of twenty-four totally laparoscopic vascular procedures for aortoiliac occlusive disease.24例完全腹腔镜下针对主髂动脉闭塞性疾病的血管手术的手术结果及预后
J Vasc Surg. 1998 Jul;28(1):136-42. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70209-5.
10
A comparative cohort study of totally laparoscopic and open aortobifemoral bypass for the treatment of advanced atherosclerosis.一项关于完全腹腔镜与开放性主-双股动脉旁路移植术治疗晚期动脉粥样硬化的比较队列研究。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2015 Sep 18;11:541-7. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S92671. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Ferritin, Serum Iron and Hemoglobin as Acute Phase Reactants in Laparoscopic and Open Surgery of Cholecystectomy: An Observational Prospective Study.铁蛋白、血清铁和血红蛋白作为腹腔镜与开腹胆囊切除术急性期反应物的观察性前瞻性研究
Pathophysiology. 2022 Oct 11;29(4):583-594. doi: 10.3390/pathophysiology29040045.
2
The Impact of Inflammation on the Immune Responses to Transplantation: Tolerance or Rejection?炎症对移植免疫反应的影响:耐受还是排斥?
Front Immunol. 2021 Nov 22;12:667834. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.667834. eCollection 2021.
3
The Inflammatory Response to Surgery in Sickle Cell Disease Patients Undergoing Cholecystectomy.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparative cohort study of totally laparoscopic and open aortobifemoral bypass for the treatment of advanced atherosclerosis.一项关于完全腹腔镜与开放性主-双股动脉旁路移植术治疗晚期动脉粥样硬化的比较队列研究。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2015 Sep 18;11:541-7. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S92671. eCollection 2015.
2
Routine clinical markers of the magnitude of the systemic inflammatory response after elective operation: a systematic review.择期手术后全身炎症反应程度的常规临床指标:一项系统评价
Surgery. 2015 Feb;157(2):362-80. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.09.009.
3
Comparison of laparoscopic and open aortobifemoral bypass in the treatment of aortoiliac disease. Results of a contemporary series (2003-2009).
镰状细胞病患者行胆囊切除术时对手术的炎症反应。
JSLS. 2019 Apr-Jun;23(2). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2019.00027.
4
Cost-utility analysis comparing laparoscopic vs open aortobifemoral bypass surgery.比较腹腔镜与开放主动脉双股动脉搭桥手术的成本效用分析。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017 Jun 19;13:217-224. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S138516. eCollection 2017.
5
Totally laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass surgery in the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease or abdominal aortic aneurysms - a systematic review and critical appraisal of literature.全腹腔镜主动脉双股动脉搭桥手术治疗主髂动脉闭塞性疾病或腹主动脉瘤——文献的系统评价与批判性分析
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017 May 18;13:187-199. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S130707. eCollection 2017.
6
Patient-perceived health-related quality of life before and after laparoscopic aortobifemoral bypass.腹腔镜腹主动脉-双股动脉搭桥术前及术后患者自我感知的健康相关生活质量
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017 May 12;13:169-176. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S134669. eCollection 2017.
腹腔镜与开放主动脉双股动脉旁路移植术治疗主髂动脉疾病的比较。当代系列研究(2003 - 2009年)结果
Acta Chir Belg. 2012 Jan;112(1):51-8. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2012.11680795.
4
Laparoscopic versus open approach for aortobifemoral bypass for severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease--a multicentre randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗严重主髂动脉闭塞性疾病的腹主动脉-股动脉旁路术:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012 Jun;43(6):711-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
5
Interleukin-6 in surgery, trauma, and critical care part II: clinical implications.白细胞介素-6 在外科手术、创伤和重症监护中的作用 Ⅱ:临床意义。
J Intensive Care Med. 2011 Mar-Apr;26(2):73-87. doi: 10.1177/0885066610384188.
6
Plasma concentrations of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and outcome prediction in elderly hip fracture patients.老年髋部骨折患者促炎和抗炎细胞因子的血浆浓度与预后预测。
Injury. 2011 Jul;42(7):707-13. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
7
Analytic review: Interleukin-6 in surgery, trauma, and critical care: part I: basic science.分析综述:白细胞介素-6 在外科手术、创伤和重症监护中的作用:第一部分:基础科学。
J Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jan-Feb;26(1):3-12. doi: 10.1177/0885066610395678.
8
Early elevation in random plasma IL-6 after severe injury is associated with development of organ failure.严重创伤后随机血浆 IL-6 的早期升高与器官衰竭的发展有关。
Shock. 2010 Oct;34(4):346-51. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e3181d8e687.
9
The humoral response after laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹结直肠手术后的体液反应:荟萃分析。
J Surg Res. 2010 Nov;164(1):28-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2010.05.046. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
10
Laparoscopic aortic surgery: Techniques and results.腹腔镜主动脉手术:技术与结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Dec;48(6 Suppl):37S-44S; discussion 45S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.033. Epub 2008 Oct 22.