Suppr超能文献

光生物调节疗法与肩胛上神经脉冲射频治疗慢性肩痛的比较:一项随机对照单盲临床试验

Comparison of photobiomodulation therapy and suprascapular nerve-pulsed radiofrequency in chronic shoulder pain: a randomized controlled, single-blind, clinical trial.

作者信息

Ökmen Burcu Metin, Ökmen Korgün

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Mimar Sinan Mah. Emniyet Street No. 35 Yıldırım, Bursa, Turkey.

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Bursa, Turkey.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Nov;32(8):1719-1726. doi: 10.1007/s10103-017-2237-3. Epub 2017 May 25.

Abstract

Shoulder pain can be difficult to treat due to its complex anatomic structure, and different treatment methods can be used. We aimed to examine the efficacy of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) and suprascapular nerve (SSN)-pulsed radiofrequency (RF) therapy. In this prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind study, 59 patients with chronic shoulder pain due to impingement syndrome received PBMT (group H) or SSN-pulsed RF therapy (group P) in addition to exercise therapy for 14 sessions over 2 weeks. Records were taken using visual analog scale (VAS), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) scoring systems for pretreatment (PRT), posttreatment (PST), and PST follow-up at months 1, 3, and 6. There was no statistically significant difference in initial VAS score, SPADI, and NHP values between group H and group P (p > 0.05). Compared to the values of PRT, PST, and PST at months 1, 3, and 6, VAS, SPADI, and NHP values were statistically significantly lower in both groups (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference at all measurement times in VAS, SPADI, and NHP between the two groups. We established that PBMT and SSN-pulsed RF therapy are effective methods, in addition to exercise therapy, in patients with chronic shoulder pain. PBMT seems to be advantageous compared to SSN-pulsed RF therapy, as it is a noninvasive method.

摘要

由于肩部解剖结构复杂,肩部疼痛可能难以治疗,可采用不同的治疗方法。我们旨在研究光生物调节疗法(PBMT)和肩胛上神经(SSN)脉冲射频(RF)疗法的疗效。在这项前瞻性、随机、对照、单盲研究中,59例因撞击综合征导致慢性肩部疼痛的患者除接受运动疗法外,还接受了PBMT(H组)或SSN脉冲射频疗法(P组),为期2周,共14次治疗。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、肩部疼痛和功能障碍指数(SPADI)以及诺丁汉健康量表(NHP)评分系统记录治疗前(PRT)、治疗后(PST)以及第1、3和6个月的PST随访情况。H组和P组的初始VAS评分、SPADI和NHP值在统计学上无显著差异(p>0.05)。与PRT、PST以及第1、3和6个月的PST值相比,两组的VAS、SPADI和NHP值在统计学上均显著降低(p<0.001)。两组在所有测量时间的VAS、SPADI和NHP方面均无统计学显著差异。我们确定,除运动疗法外,PBMT和SSN脉冲射频疗法对慢性肩部疼痛患者是有效的治疗方法。与SSN脉冲射频疗法相比,PBMT似乎更具优势,因为它是一种非侵入性方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验