Suppr超能文献

彩色多普勒是诊断肠旋转不良的可靠方法吗?

Is color Doppler a reliable method for the diagnosis of malrotation?

作者信息

Karaman İbrahim, Karaman Ayşe, Çınar Hasibe Gökçe, Ertürk Ahmet, Erdoğan Derya, Özgüner İsmet Faruk

机构信息

Deparment of Pediatric Surgery, Dr. Sami Ulus Childrens Hospital, Babür cad. No. 44, Altındağ, Ankara, Turkey.

Deparment of Radiology, Dr. Sami Ulus Childrens Hospital, Babür cad. No. 44, Altındağ, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Med Ultrason (2001). 2018 Jan;45(1):59-64. doi: 10.1007/s10396-017-0794-5. Epub 2017 May 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The gold standard for the diagnosis of malrotation is barium contrast study of the upper gastrointestinal system (UGCS), while color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) is another method used in the diagnosis. We investigated the value of CDUS for the diagnosis of malrotation in this study.

METHODS

UGCS images, CDUS images, plain abdominal images, demographic data, and symptoms of 82 patients who were investigated for presumed malrotation during a 7-year period were evaluated, retrospectively.

RESULTS

All patients underwent CDUS, and 18% of these patients were diagnosed with malrotation as the superior mesenteric vein was seen to be on the left of the superior mesenteric artery. We found that 16% of the 75 patients who underwent UGCS were diagnosed with malrotation. The sensitivity and specificity of CDUS in the diagnosis of malrotation was found to be 93.8 and 100%, respectively. The respective values for UGCS were 91.7 and 98.4%.

CONCLUSION

Current data in the literature and our results underline that UGCS may yield false-positive and false-negative results. Although CDUS was found to be a reliable method for the diagnosis of malrotation in our study, the limitations of UGCS are also recognized for CDUS. Prospective studies are needed to determine the more valuable method.

摘要

目的

上消化道系统(UGCS)钡剂造影是诊断肠旋转不良的金标准,而彩色多普勒超声检查(CDUS)是用于诊断的另一种方法。在本研究中,我们调查了CDUS对肠旋转不良的诊断价值。

方法

回顾性评估了82例在7年期间因疑似肠旋转不良而接受检查的患者的UGCS图像、CDUS图像、腹部平片、人口统计学数据和症状。

结果

所有患者均接受了CDUS检查,其中18%的患者被诊断为肠旋转不良,因为可见肠系膜上静脉位于肠系膜上动脉左侧。我们发现,在接受UGCS检查的75例患者中,16%被诊断为肠旋转不良。CDUS诊断肠旋转不良的敏感性和特异性分别为93.8%和100%。UGCS的相应值分别为91.7%和98.4%。

结论

文献中的现有数据和我们的结果强调,UGCS可能会产生假阳性和假阴性结果。尽管在我们的研究中发现CDUS是诊断肠旋转不良的可靠方法,但也认识到CDUS存在与UGCS类似的局限性。需要进行前瞻性研究以确定更有价值的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验