Suppr超能文献

儿科创伤和非创伤患者的院前输血:单中心安全性和结局回顾

Prehospital blood transfusions in pediatric trauma and nontrauma patients: a single-center review of safety and outcomes.

作者信息

Fahy Aodhnait S, Thiels Cornelius A, Polites Stephanie F, Parker Maile, Ishitani Michael B, Moir Christopher R, Berns Kathleen, Stubbs James R, Jenkins Donald H, Zietlow Scott P, Zielinski Martin D

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.

Division of Pediatric Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Surg Int. 2017 Jul;33(7):787-792. doi: 10.1007/s00383-017-4092-5. Epub 2017 May 25.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Prehospital transfusions are a novel yet increasingly accepted intervention in the adult population as part of remote damage control resuscitation, but prehospital transfusions remain controversial in children. Our purpose was to review our pediatric prehospital transfusion experience over 12 years to describe the safety of prehospital transfusion in appropriately triaged trauma and nontrauma patients.

METHODS

Children (<18 years) transfused with packed red blood cells (pRBC) or plasma during transport to a single regional academic medical center between 2002 and 2014 were identified. Admission details, in-hospital clinical course, and outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

28 children were transfused during transport; median age was 8.9 ± 7 years and 15 patients were male (54%). Most patients required at least one additional unit of blood products during their hospitalization (79%), and/or required operative intervention (53%), endoscopy (7%), or died during their hospitalization (14%). Comparison of trauma patients (n = 16) and nontrauma patients (n = 12) revealed that nontrauma patients were younger, more anemic, more coagulopathy on admission, and required more ongoing transfusion in the hospital. Trauma patients were more likely to need operative intervention. No patient had a transfusion reaction.

CONCLUSION

Remote damage control prehospital transfusions of blood products were safe in this small group of appropriately triaged pediatric patients. Further studies are needed to determine if outcomes are improved and to devise a rigorous protocol for this prehospital intervention for critically ill pediatric patients.

摘要

目的

作为远程损伤控制复苏的一部分,院前输血在成年人群中是一种新颖但越来越被接受的干预措施,但院前输血在儿童中仍存在争议。我们的目的是回顾我们12年来的儿科院前输血经验,以描述在经过适当分诊的创伤和非创伤患者中进行院前输血的安全性。

方法

确定2002年至2014年间在转运至单一区域学术医疗中心期间接受浓缩红细胞(pRBC)或血浆输血的18岁以下儿童。分析入院细节、住院期间的临床病程和结局。

结果

28名儿童在转运期间接受了输血;中位年龄为8.9±7岁,15名患者为男性(54%)。大多数患者在住院期间需要至少额外输注一个单位的血液制品(79%),和/或需要手术干预(53%)、内镜检查(7%),或在住院期间死亡(14%)。创伤患者(n = 16)和非创伤患者(n = 12)的比较显示,非创伤患者年龄更小,入院时贫血更严重,凝血功能障碍更明显,且在医院需要更多的持续输血。创伤患者更有可能需要手术干预。没有患者发生输血反应。

结论

在这一小群经过适当分诊的儿科患者中,远程损伤控制院前输血血液制品是安全的。需要进一步研究以确定结局是否得到改善,并为这种针对重症儿科患者的院前干预制定严格的方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验