Suppr超能文献

向富含¹³C的森林土壤中添加¹³C、¹⁴C和¹⁵C标记糖时微生物呼吸过程中的碳同位素分馏

C-discrimination during microbial respiration of added C-, C- and C-labelled sugars to a C-forest soil.

作者信息

Ekblad Alf, Nyberg Gert, Högberg Peter

机构信息

Department of Forest Ecology, Section of Soil Science SLU, 901 83, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

Oecologia. 2002 Apr;131(2):245-249. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-0869-9. Epub 2002 Apr 1.

Abstract

We tested whether C-discrimination during microbial respiration, or during CO sampling in the field, can explain changes observed in the δC of emitted CO that follow the addition of C-sucrose, as a microbial substrate, to the soil of a C-ecosystem. We approached this problem by adding C-glucose (δC=-23.4‰), C-sucrose (-10.8‰) or C-labelled glucose (103.7‰) to the intact mor layer, the upper organic soil (-26.5‰, bulk soil organic matter), of a boreal Pinus sylvestris L. forest. If C-discrimination is significant, it should generate illusory differences in the calculated contributions from the added C and endogenous C-C to total soil respiration, when C-sucrose or C-labelled glucose is added. Further, if discrimination occurs, we should also be able to detect a shift in the δC of respired CO after the addition of C-glucose. The addition of the three sugar solutions gave similar increases in soil respiration (up to a doubling 1 h after the additions), while the addition of water gave no increase in respiration. There was no change in δC of the emitted CO after additions of HO or C-glucose. In contrast, the addition of C-sucrose and C-labelled glucose gave δC values of evolved CO that were 4.5‰ and 30.3‰ higher than the pre-sugar values, respectively. The calculated respiration rates of the added carbon sources, C-C or C-labelled C, were very similar. Also, we found very similar sugar-induced increases in respiration of endogenous C-C in the plots supplied with C-sucrose and C-labelled glucose, accounting for about 50% of the total increase in respiration 1 h after addition. Our results confirm that any microbial C-discrimination during respiration is minor.

摘要

我们测试了在微生物呼吸过程中,或者在野外采集一氧化碳样本时,碳同位素分馏是否能够解释在向碳生态系统的土壤中添加作为微生物底物的蔗糖后,所观察到的排放一氧化碳的δC变化。我们通过向北方樟子松森林完整的粗腐殖质层(上部有机土壤,δC = -26.5‰,土壤有机质总体)添加葡萄糖(δC = -23.4‰)、蔗糖(-10.8‰)或碳标记葡萄糖(103.7‰)来解决这个问题。如果碳同位素分馏显著,那么在添加蔗糖或碳标记葡萄糖时,它应该会在计算添加碳和内源性碳对土壤总呼吸的贡献时产生虚假差异。此外,如果发生分馏,我们还应该能够检测到添加葡萄糖后呼吸产生的一氧化碳的δC发生变化。添加三种糖溶液后土壤呼吸都有类似的增加(添加后1小时内最多增加一倍),而添加水后呼吸没有增加。添加水或葡萄糖后,排放的一氧化碳的δC没有变化。相比之下,添加蔗糖和碳标记葡萄糖后,产生的一氧化碳的δC值分别比添加糖之前的值高4.5‰和30.3‰。计算得出的添加碳源(未标记碳或碳标记碳)的呼吸速率非常相似。此外,我们发现在添加蔗糖和碳标记葡萄糖的样地中,由糖诱导的内源性未标记碳的呼吸增加非常相似,约占添加后1小时呼吸总增加量的50%。我们的结果证实,呼吸过程中任何微生物的碳同位素分馏作用都很小。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验