Ashraf M, Souka A A R
Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, In front of 27 Maarouf Rasafi street, Kafr Abdou, Roshdi, Alexandria, Egypt.
Ophthalmology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt.
Eye (Lond). 2017 Nov;31(11):1523-1536. doi: 10.1038/eye.2017.81. Epub 2017 May 26.
The recent VIEW studies have demonstrated the non-inferiority of monthly and bi-monthly aflibercept in the management of wet age related macular degeneration (AMD) compared with ranibizumab. However, the current data are limited mainly to fixed dosing regimens with few studies looking at flexible dosing regimens of aflibercept in wet AMD. In addition, recent data from the VIEW 96 week extension has shown that patients being shifted from fixed dosing regimens to PRN have shown a drop in visual acuity and increase in central macular thickness. This is an indication that fixed dosing, a non-sustainable option, is only effective as long as it is continued. Regimens such as treat and extend (TAE) and pro-re nata (PRN) have been studied extensively in ranibizumab and bevacizumab and have shown to be effective options. With the presence of effective, established and less costly drugs such as ranibizumab and bevacizumab, the role of aflibercept as a primary treatment modality has yet to be clearly defined. The current review provides an analysis of the VIEW studies, as well as the extension phases. It also looks at post hoc analysis of predictors of response and outcomes. We have also conducted a search on studies comparing between PRN regimens using aflibercept and other anti-VEGF agents. This review also explores cheaper off label aflibercept; ziv-aflibercept in the treatment of wet AMD. The main purpose of the review is to delineate the role of aflibercept as a primary therapeutic option and if there are any significant advantages that would advocate its use over alternative anti-VEGF drugs. Finally, we propose a treatment algorithm for patients being started on aflibercept during the first year and thereafter.
近期的VIEW研究表明,与雷珠单抗相比,每月和每两个月一次注射阿柏西普在湿性年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)的治疗中具有非劣效性。然而,目前的数据主要限于固定给药方案,很少有研究关注阿柏西普在湿性AMD中的灵活给药方案。此外,VIEW 96周扩展研究的最新数据显示,从固定给药方案转为按需给药的患者视力下降,中心黄斑厚度增加。这表明固定给药这种不可持续的选择,只有在持续使用时才有效。治疗并延长(TAE)和按需(PRN)等给药方案在雷珠单抗和贝伐单抗中已得到广泛研究,并已证明是有效的选择。由于存在雷珠单抗和贝伐单抗等有效、成熟且成本较低的药物,阿柏西普作为主要治疗方式的作用尚未明确界定。本综述对VIEW研究以及扩展阶段进行了分析。它还探讨了反应和结果预测因素的事后分析。我们还检索了比较使用阿柏西普和其他抗VEGF药物的PRN给药方案的研究。本综述还探讨了更便宜的阿柏西普非标签用药;即Ziv-阿柏西普在湿性AMD治疗中的应用。本综述的主要目的是阐明阿柏西普作为主要治疗选择的作用,以及是否存在任何显著优势可支持其优于其他抗VEGF药物的使用。最后,我们为第一年及之后开始使用阿柏西普的患者提出了一种治疗算法。