Suppr超能文献

使用PD-L1 IHC 28-8 pharmDx和PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx评估的肺癌恶性肿瘤细胞学和组织学标本中PD-L1表达的配对比较

Paired Comparison of PD-L1 Expression on Cytologic and Histologic Specimens From Malignancies in the Lung Assessed With PD-L1 IHC 28-8pharmDx and PD-L1 IHC 22C3pharmDx.

作者信息

Skov Birgit G, Skov Torsten

机构信息

*Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet †Medical Department, Mørkhøj Parkalle, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2017 Aug;25(7):453-459. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000540.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression is a predictive biomarker for anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. Different immunohistochemistry (IHC) assays have been developed on histologic material with different cutoffs for positivity. More than one third of the patients are diagnosed on cytology alone. We hypothesized that cytologic cell block material is suitable for PD-L1 analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eighty-six paired samples of malignancies from the lung where cytologic cell block and histologic material were available from the same lesion were stained with PD-L1 IHC 28-8pharmDx and PD-L1 IHC 22C3pharmDx. Scorings of like material (cytology or histology) stained with different assays were analyzed in order to evaluate the analytical agreement between assays. Scoring of different materials stained with like assays were analyzed in order to evaluate the agreement between cytology and histology.

RESULTS

A high degree of agreement was found between 28-8pharmDx and 22C3pharmDx, whether applied to histologic or cytologic cell blocks, with Pearson R of 0.95. The Pearson R between 2 rounds of assessment of the same assay on the same type of material was also 0.95. The agreement between histologic and cytologic specimens was high with Pearson R 0.87 to 0.89 and overall agreement between 85% and 95%. There was no bias toward lower prevalence of positivity with cytology than with histology. Disagreement was related to heterogeneity of the histologic tumor sample.

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 assessment is feasible on cytologic material with the tested assays using cutoffs for positivity similar to those used on histologic material.

摘要

背景

程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)表达是非小细胞肺癌抗PD-1免疫治疗的预测生物标志物。针对组织学材料已开发出不同的免疫组织化学(IHC)检测方法,其阳性判定值不同。超过三分之一的患者仅通过细胞学诊断。我们推测细胞学细胞块材料适用于PD-L1分析。

材料与方法

86对来自肺部恶性肿瘤的配对样本,同一病变部位同时有细胞学细胞块和组织学材料,用PD-L1 IHC 28-8pharmDx和PD-L1 IHC 22C3pharmDx进行染色。分析用不同检测方法对同类材料(细胞学或组织学)染色的评分,以评估检测方法之间的分析一致性。分析用同类检测方法对不同材料染色的评分,以评估细胞学和组织学之间的一致性。

结果

无论是应用于组织学细胞块还是细胞学细胞块,28-8pharmDx和22C3pharmDx之间均发现高度一致性,Pearson相关系数R为0.95。对同一类型材料进行两轮相同检测方法评估之间的Pearson相关系数R也为0.95。组织学和细胞学标本之间的一致性较高,Pearson相关系数R为0.87至0.89,总体一致性在85%至95%之间。与组织学相比,细胞学阳性率较低并无偏差。不一致性与组织学肿瘤样本的异质性有关。

结论

使用与组织学材料相同的阳性判定值,通过所测试的检测方法对细胞学材料进行PD-L1评估是可行的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验