• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

程序性细胞死亡配体 1 免疫组织化学评分在非小细胞肺癌细胞学标本中的观察者间一致性。

Interobserver agreement in programmed cell death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry scoring in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma cytologic specimens.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Wexner Medical Center at The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA.

出版信息

Diagn Cytopathol. 2021 Feb;49(2):219-225. doi: 10.1002/dc.24651. Epub 2020 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1002/dc.24651
PMID:33104298
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The evaluation of PD-L1 expression in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) is becoming increasingly important given the effectiveness of PD-L1 inhibitors. Although cytologic specimens have been shown to be compatible with surgical specimens to evaluate PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC), evidence of the reproducibility of PD-L1 in cytologic specimens is lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate interobserver agreement in PD-L1 IHC in cytologic specimens.

METHODS

PD-L1 IHC was performed on 86 NSCLC cytology specimens using Dako PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx. The digitally scanned whole slide images (WSI) were read by five pathologists. Each case was given a Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) and the results were compared between the observers. The interobserver concordance was assessed using 1% and 50% as cutoffs.

RESULTS

TPSs were highly correlated among observers (Spearman correlation coefficient, 0.86-0.94). Using greater than 1% as a cutoff, interobserver agreement measured by Fleiss Kappa was 0.74 for all pathologists and Cohen's Kappa coefficient ranged from 0.49 to 0.83, consistent with moderate to substantial agreement. With a cutoff of greater than 50%, Fleiss Kappa was 0.79 for all pathologists and the kappa values ranged from 0.63 to 0.90, consistent with substantial to almost perfect agreement. Several pitfalls were identified by reviewing discordant cases, including staining in macrophages, stromal cells, and intratumoral heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that TPS of PD-L1 IHC on cytology specimens is reproducible, with a better agreement when using 50% as the cutoff value. However, special attention is required when the TPS is near the 1% cutoff.

摘要

背景

鉴于 PD-L1 抑制剂的有效性,非小细胞肺癌 (NSCLC) 中 PD-L1 表达的评估变得越来越重要。虽然细胞学标本已被证明与手术标本具有兼容性,可用于评估 PD-L1 免疫组化(IHC),但缺乏细胞学标本中 PD-L1 可重复性的证据。本研究旨在评估 PD-L1 IHC 在细胞学标本中的观察者间一致性。

方法

使用 Dako PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx 在 86 例 NSCLC 细胞学标本上进行 PD-L1 IHC。五位病理学家对数字化扫描的全切片图像(WSI)进行了阅读。每个病例都给出了肿瘤比例评分(TPS),并比较了观察者之间的结果。使用 1%和 50%作为截止值来评估观察者间的一致性。

结果

TPS 在观察者之间高度相关(Spearman 相关系数为 0.86-0.94)。使用大于 1%作为截止值,由 Fleiss Kappa 测量的观察者间一致性为所有病理学家的 0.74,Cohen's Kappa 系数范围为 0.49 至 0.83,一致为中度至高度一致。使用大于 50%的截止值时,所有病理学家的 Fleiss Kappa 为 0.79,kappa 值范围为 0.63 至 0.90,一致为高度至几乎完美一致。通过审查不一致的病例,确定了几个陷阱,包括巨噬细胞、基质细胞和肿瘤内异质性中的染色。

结论

我们的数据表明,细胞学标本中 PD-L1 IHC 的 TPS 是可重复的,当使用 50%作为截止值时,一致性更好。但是,当 TPS 接近 1%的截止值时,需要特别注意。

相似文献

1
Interobserver agreement in programmed cell death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry scoring in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma cytologic specimens.程序性细胞死亡配体 1 免疫组织化学评分在非小细胞肺癌细胞学标本中的观察者间一致性。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2021 Feb;49(2):219-225. doi: 10.1002/dc.24651. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
2
Comparative analysis of programmed death ligand 1 expression in paired cytologic and histologic specimens of non-small cell lung cancer.非小细胞肺癌配对细胞学和组织学标本中程序性死亡配体 1 表达的对比分析。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2020 Aug;128(8):580-588. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22292. Epub 2020 May 28.
3
Programmed death ligand 1 testing in non-small cell lung carcinoma cytology cell block and aspirate smear preparations.程序性死亡配体 1 检测在非小细胞肺癌细胞学细胞块和抽吸涂片制备中的应用。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2018 May;126(5):342-352. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21987. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
4
Assessment of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Immunohistochemical Expression on Cytology Specimens in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma.非小细胞肺癌细胞学标本中程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)免疫组织化学表达的评估。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2019 Mar 1;151(4):403-415. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqy164.
5
Cytologic-histologic correlation of programmed death-ligand 1 immunohistochemistry in lung carcinomas.肺癌中程序性死亡配体 1 免疫组化的细胞-组织学相关性。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2018 Apr;126(4):253-263. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21973. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
6
Comparison of PD-L1 Expression Using 2 Validated PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx Methods in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in a Routine Hospital Setting.在常规医院环境中使用两种经过验证的 PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx 方法检测非小细胞肺癌中的 PD-L1 表达的比较。
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2021 Jan;29(1):49-55. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000827.
7
Implementation of PD-L1 22C3 IHC pharmDxTM in Cell Block Preparations of Lung Cancer: Concordance with Surgical Resections and Technical Validation of CytoLyt® Prefixation.肺癌细胞块制备中PD-L1 22C3免疫组化检测试剂盒(PharmDxTM)的应用:与手术切除标本的一致性及CytoLyt®预固定的技术验证
Acta Cytol. 2020;64(6):577-587. doi: 10.1159/000508628. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
8
PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung carcinoma: Comparison among cytology, small biopsy, and surgical resection specimens.非小细胞肺癌中程序性死亡受体配体1(PD-L1)的表达:细胞学、小活检及手术切除标本的比较
Cancer Cytopathol. 2017 Dec;125(12):896-907. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21937. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
9
EBUS-FNA cytologic-histologic correlation of PD-L1 immunohistochemistry in non-small cell lung cancer.非小细胞肺癌中 PD-L1 免疫组化的 EBUS-FNA 细胞学-组织学相关性。
J Am Soc Cytopathol. 2020 Nov-Dec;9(6):485-493. doi: 10.1016/j.jasc.2020.04.003. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
10
Comparison of PD-L1 expression between paired cytologic and histologic specimens from non-small cell lung cancer patients.比较非小细胞肺癌患者配对的细胞学和组织学标本中的 PD-L1 表达。
Virchows Arch. 2020 Feb;476(2):261-271. doi: 10.1007/s00428-019-02632-7. Epub 2019 Aug 7.

引用本文的文献

1
InterobServer AgreeMent in Pd-l1 evaLuatIoN on cytoloGical samples-SAMPLING project: A multi-institutional, international study.细胞样本中PD-L1评估的观察者间一致性——抽样项目:一项多机构、国际研究
Cancer Cytopathol. 2025 Mar;133(3):e70003. doi: 10.1002/cncy.70003.
2
Identification and Quantification of Radiotherapy-related Protein Expression in Cancer Tissues Using the Qupath Software and Prediction of Treatment Response.使用 Qupath 软件鉴定和量化癌症组织中的放疗相关蛋白表达,并预测治疗反应。
In Vivo. 2024 May-Jun;38(3):1470-1476. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13593.
3
Validation of automated positive cell and region detection of immunohistochemically stained laryngeal tumor tissue using digital image analysis.
使用数字图像分析对免疫组织化学染色的喉肿瘤组织进行自动阳性细胞和区域检测的验证。
J Pathol Inform. 2023 Jan 29;14:100198. doi: 10.1016/j.jpi.2023.100198. eCollection 2023.
4
Nationwide differences in cytology fixation and processing methods and their impact on interlaboratory variation in PD-L1 positivity.细胞学固定和处理方法的全国性差异及其对 PD-L1 阳性率的实验室间差异的影响。
Virchows Arch. 2023 Apr;482(4):707-720. doi: 10.1007/s00428-022-03446-w. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
5
Prospective Optimization of Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration Lymph Node Assessment for Lung Cancer: Three Needle Agitations Are Noninferior to 10 Agitations for Adequate Tumor Cell and DNA Yield.肺癌支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸活检淋巴结评估的前瞻性优化:三次针搅动在获得足够肿瘤细胞和DNA产量方面不劣于十次搅动。
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2022 Aug 30;3(10):100403. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100403. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
Program death ligand-1 immunocytochemistry in lung cancer cytological samples: A systematic review.程序性死亡配体-1 免疫细胞化学在肺癌细胞学样本中的应用:系统评价。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2022 Jun;50(6):313-323. doi: 10.1002/dc.24955. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
7
Factors Influencing Concordance of PD-L1 Expression between Biopsies and Cytological Specimens in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.影响非小细胞肺癌活检与细胞学标本中PD-L1表达一致性的因素
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Oct 18;11(10):1927. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11101927.
8
EMMPRIN expression is associated with metastatic progression in osteosarcoma.EMMPRIN 表达与骨肉瘤的转移进展相关。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Sep 26;21(1):1059. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08774-9.
9
PD-L1 and beyond: Immuno-oncology in cytopathology.PD-L1 及其他:细胞病理学中的免疫肿瘤学。
Cytopathology. 2021 Sep;32(5):596-603. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12982. Epub 2021 May 6.