• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

威斯康星州奶农就医的农业伤害的社会环境风险因素。

Socio-environmental risk factors for medically-attended agricultural injuries in Wisconsin dairy farmers.

作者信息

VanWormer Jeffrey J, Barnes Kathrine L, Waring Stephen C, Keifer Matthew C

机构信息

Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Population Health, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, United States.

National Farm Medicine Center, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, United States.

出版信息

Injury. 2017 Jul;48(7):1444-1450. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.05.027. Epub 2017 May 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2017.05.027
PMID:28551053
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10015439/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accidents are common in the agricultural industry, particularly among dairy farmers. How said farmers get hurt is well established, but far less is known about how distal, socio-environmental factors influence injuries. This study examined associations between medically-attended agricultural injuries and: (1) personal sociodemographic characteristics, and (2) farm environment features and general safety practices.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was implemented with linked data from electronic health records on prior agricultural injuries that occurred between 01/01/2002-12/31/2015. The sample included adult dairy producers who resided in north-central Wisconsin (USA) and were medically-homed to the Marshfield Clinic Health System. Multiple logistic regression was used to analyze associations between socio-environmental characteristics and agricultural injuries.

RESULTS

There were 620 dairy farmers in the analytical sample, with 50 medically-attended agricultural injuries observed during the 14-year study time period (5.7 injuries per 1000 dairy farmers per year). In the multivariable model, the odds of agricultural injury were significantly greater among farmers who have private individually-purchased health insurance (OR=4.25; 95% CI: 1.31, 13.84), do not live at their dairy operation (OR=2.91; CI: 1.27, 6.67), and do not provide safety training to their workers (OR=4.27; CI: 1.00, 18.21).

CONCLUSIONS

Dairy farmers in this analysis who did not live at their dairy operation, did not provide safety training to all their workers, or had individually-purchased health insurance were more apt to get injured, but more research is needed to confirm these findings in prospectively designed studies. How these factors can be directly addressed or otherwise used to better focus farm injury prevention initiatives should also be explored.

摘要

背景

事故在农业行业很常见,尤其是在奶农中。奶农受伤的方式已广为人知,但关于远端社会环境因素如何影响伤害的了解却少得多。本研究调查了需就医的农业伤害与以下因素之间的关联:(1)个人社会人口学特征,以及(2)农场环境特征和一般安全措施。

方法

采用横断面调查,链接了2002年1月1日至2015年12月31日期间发生的既往农业伤害的电子健康记录数据。样本包括居住在美国威斯康星州中北部、在马什菲尔德诊所医疗系统就医的成年奶农。采用多因素逻辑回归分析社会环境特征与农业伤害之间的关联。

结果

分析样本中有620名奶农,在14年的研究期间观察到50起需就医的农业伤害(每年每1000名奶农中有5.7起伤害)。在多变量模型中,拥有个人购买的私人健康保险的农民(OR=4.25;95%CI:1.31,13.84)、不住在奶牛场的农民(OR=2.91;CI:1.27,6.67)以及未为工人提供安全培训的农民(OR=4.27;CI:1.00,18.21)发生农业伤害的几率显著更高。

结论

本分析中不住在奶牛场、未为所有工人提供安全培训或拥有个人购买的健康保险的奶农更容易受伤,但需要更多研究在前瞻性设计的研究中证实这些发现。还应探索如何直接解决这些因素或以其他方式利用这些因素,以便更好地聚焦农场伤害预防措施。

相似文献

1
Socio-environmental risk factors for medically-attended agricultural injuries in Wisconsin dairy farmers.威斯康星州奶农就医的农业伤害的社会环境风险因素。
Injury. 2017 Jul;48(7):1444-1450. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.05.027. Epub 2017 May 21.
2
Risk factors for occupational injuries among full-time farmers in Finland.芬兰全职农民职业伤害的风险因素。
J Agric Saf Health. 2012 Apr;18(2):83-93. doi: 10.13031/2013.41348.
3
Does multifunctionality matter to US farmers? Farmer motivations and conceptions of multifunctionality in dairy systems.多功能性对美国农民重要吗?奶业系统中农民对多功能性的动机及概念理解
J Environ Manage. 2014 Dec 15;146:451-462. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.034. Epub 2014 Aug 17.
4
Characteristics of and risk factors for compensated occupational injury and disease claims in dairy farmers: a case-control study.奶农代偿性职业伤害和疾病索赔的特征及风险因素:一项病例对照研究。
J Agric Saf Health. 2013 Jul;19(3):191-206. doi: 10.13031/jash.19.10172.
5
Virginia agricultural health and safety survey.弗吉尼亚农业健康与安全调查
J Agric Saf Health. 2009 Jan;15(1):37-47. doi: 10.13031/2013.25414.
6
Differences among Thai Agricultural Workers' Health, Working Conditions, and Pesticide Use by Farm Type.不同类型农场中泰国农业工人的健康状况、工作条件和农药使用情况的差异。
Ann Work Expo Health. 2018 Feb 13;62(2):167-181. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxx099.
7
Work exposures, injuries, and musculoskeletal discomfort among children and adolescents in dairy farming.奶业养殖中儿童和青少年的工作暴露、伤害及肌肉骨骼不适
J Agromedicine. 2009;14(1):9-21. doi: 10.1080/10599240802612463.
8
Farm Activities and Agricultural Injuries in Youth and Young Adult Workers.青年和年轻成年工人的农场活动与农业伤害
J Agromedicine. 2015;20(3):318-26. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2015.1042614.
9
Sorting Through the Spheres of Influence: Using Modified Pile Sorting to Describe Who Influences Dairy Farmers' Decision-Making About Safety.梳理影响范围:运用改良堆排序法描述影响奶农安全决策的因素。
J Agromedicine. 2017;22(4):316-327. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2017.1353938.
10
Determinants of injury among older Saskatchewan farm operators: A prospective cohort study.萨斯喀彻温省老年农场经营者受伤的决定因素:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Am J Ind Med. 2019 Dec;62(12):1135-1143. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23052. Epub 2019 Oct 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Profile and risk factors in farmer injuries: a review based on Haddon matrix and 5 E's risk reduction strategy.农民伤害的特征和危险因素:基于 Haddon 矩阵和 5E 减少风险策略的综述。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jun 6;12:1322884. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1322884. eCollection 2024.
2
Recruitment of Row Crop Farmers into a Research Study to Assess Farm Hazards.招募大田作物农民参与研究评估农场危害。
J Agromedicine. 2024 Jan;29(1):34-43. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2023.2282137. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
3
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of injuries in agricultural and nonagricultural workers visiting the emergency department: a propensity-matched analysis.前往急诊科就诊的农业和非农业工人受伤的临床特征及结局:一项倾向匹配分析
Clin Exp Emerg Med. 2024 Mar;11(1):68-78. doi: 10.15441/ceem.23.022. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
4
Regional surveillance of medically-attended farm-related injuries in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年与农业相关的医疗性伤害的区域性监测。
Front Public Health. 2022 Dec 14;10:1031618. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1031618. eCollection 2022.
5
Redesigning a Sentinel Surveillance System for Collecting and Disseminating Near Real-Time Agricultural Injury Reports: System Usability Study.重新设计用于收集和传播近实时农业伤害报告的哨点监测系统:系统可用性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2019 Aug 2;3(3):e13621. doi: 10.2196/13621.
6
Respiratory health, allergies, and the farm environment: design, methods and enrollment in the observational Wisconsin Infant Study Cohort (WISC): a research proposal.呼吸健康、过敏与农场环境:威斯康星州婴儿观察队列研究(WISC)的设计、方法与招募:一项研究提案
BMC Res Notes. 2019 Jul 16;12(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s13104-019-4448-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Interventions to reduce injuries among older workers in agriculture: A review of evaluated intervention projects.减少农业老年工人受伤的干预措施:对已评估干预项目的综述。
Work. 2016 Oct 17;55(2):471-480. doi: 10.3233/WOR-162407.
2
Implementing a National Tractor Safety Program: Using "Whole System in a Room" to Mobilize Partners and Implement Solutions.实施国家拖拉机安全计划:利用“一室全系统”模式动员合作伙伴并实施解决方案。
J Agromedicine. 2016;21(2):127-31. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2016.1142916.
3
Risk Factors for Agricultural Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.农业伤害的风险因素:一项系统综述与荟萃分析
J Agromedicine. 2015;20(4):434-49. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2015.1075450.
4
Incidence Rates and Trend of Serious Farm-Related Injury in Minnesota, 2000-2011.2000 - 2011年明尼苏达州与农场相关的严重伤害发生率及趋势
J Agromedicine. 2015;20(4):419-26. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2015.1075449.
5
Epidemiologic trends in medically-attended tree stand fall injuries among Wisconsin deer hunters.威斯康星州鹿猎手因在树林中跌倒而就医的伤害的流行病学趋势。
Injury. 2016 Jan;47(1):220-5. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.09.012. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
6
Field Tests of a Tractor Rollover Detection and Emergency Notification System.拖拉机翻车检测与紧急通知系统的现场测试
J Agric Saf Health. 2015 Apr;21(2):113-27. doi: 10.13031/jash.21.10812.
7
Estimation of agricultural and logging injury incidence in Maine using electronic administrative data sets.利用电子行政数据集估算缅因州农业和伐木行业的伤害发生率。
J Agromedicine. 2015;20(2):195-204. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2015.1009668.
8
A review of health and safety leadership and managerial practices on modern dairy farms.现代奶牛场的健康与安全领导力和管理实践综述。
J Agromedicine. 2013;18(3):265-73. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2013.796905.
9
Work-related injuries and fatalities on dairy farm operations-a global perspective.奶牛场作业相关的伤害与死亡事故——全球视角。
J Agromedicine. 2013;18(3):256-64. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2013.796904.
10
Regional epidemiologic assessment of prevalent periodontitis using an electronic health record system.利用电子健康记录系统进行区域性流行牙周炎的流行病学评估。
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Apr 1;177(7):700-7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws293. Epub 2013 Mar 4.