Rzychon Malgorzata, Brohée Marcel, Cordeiro Fernando, Haraszi Reka, Ulberth Franz, O'Connor Gavin
European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements, Retieseweg 111, Geel 2440, Belgium.
European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements, Retieseweg 111, Geel 2440, Belgium.
Food Chem. 2017 Nov 1;234:144-154. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.04.092. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
Many publications have highlighted that routine ELISA methods do not give rise to equivalent gluten content measurement results. In this study, we assess this variation between results and its likely impact on the enforcement of the EU gluten-free legislation. This study systematically examines the feasibility of harmonizing gluten ELISA assays by the introduction of: a common extraction procedure; a common calibrator, such as a pure gluten extract and an incurred matrix material. The comparability of measurements is limited by a weak correlation between kit results caused by differences in the selectivity of the methods. This lack of correlation produces bias that cannot be corrected by using reference materials alone. The use of a common calibrator reduced the between-assay variability to some extent, but variation due to differences in selectivity of the assays was unaffected. Consensus on robust markers and their conversion to "gluten content" are required.
许多出版物都强调,常规酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)方法并不能得出等效的麸质含量测量结果。在本研究中,我们评估了结果之间的这种差异及其对欧盟无麸质法规实施的可能影响。本研究通过引入以下内容系统地检验了统一麸质ELISA检测方法的可行性:一个通用的提取程序;一种通用校准物,如纯麸质提取物和含麸质的基质材料。由于方法选择性的差异导致试剂盒结果之间的相关性较弱,从而限制了测量的可比性。这种缺乏相关性产生的偏差无法仅通过使用参考物质来校正。使用通用校准物在一定程度上降低了检测间的变异性,但检测选择性差异导致的变异性并未受到影响。需要就可靠的标志物及其向“麸质含量”的转换达成共识。