Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Department of Nursing, Associate Dean for Research, School of Nursing, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;217(2):145-149. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.043. Epub 2017 May 25.
In the first part of this review, we provided currently accepted definitions of categories and subcategories of intimate partner violence and discussed the prevalence and health impacts of intimate partner violence in nonpregnant and pregnant women. Herein we review current recommendations for intimate partner violence screening and the evidence surrounding the effectiveness of intimate partner violence interventions. Screening for intimate partner violence may include exclusively identification of victims of intimate partner violence or both the identification of and intervention for victims. Until recently, many professional organizations did not recommend universal screening for intimate partner violence because of a lack of evidence of effectiveness of screening, lack of evidence demonstrating that screening is not harmful, and/or a lack of consensus regarding the most effective screening tool. The lack of evidence supporting an intervention posed an additional barrier to screening. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has been a staunch advocate for universal intimate partner violence screening, even when other groups either did not endorse screening or recommended it only for high-risk women. Recent published data confirm that screening is more reliable than usual care in identifying victims of intimate partner violence, both during pregnancy and in nonpregnant women. Likewise, recent published data show that there are no apparent harms of screening for intimate partner violence and that the act of screening may have an empowering effect on women and improve their relationship with and trust in their health care providers. Despite these findings, the implementation rate of intimate partner violence screening remains low. Most encouraging are the recent data showing that interventions performed after screening for intimate partner violence are effective in reducing depression symptoms and episodes of violence as well as improving some outcomes of pregnancy. Although there remains a lack of consensus regarding which screening tool may be the most effective, we exhort all obstetrician-gynecologists to screen all women for intimate partner violence at regular intervals and to familiarize themselves with available community resources to assist those women who have been identified as experiencing intimate partner violence through screening.
在这篇综述的第一部分,我们提供了目前被接受的亲密伴侣暴力的类别和亚类的定义,并讨论了非孕妇和孕妇中亲密伴侣暴力的流行率和健康影响。在此,我们回顾了亲密伴侣暴力筛查的当前建议,以及围绕亲密伴侣暴力干预措施有效性的证据。亲密伴侣暴力的筛查可能包括专门识别亲密伴侣暴力的受害者,或者同时识别受害者并对其进行干预。直到最近,由于缺乏筛查有效性的证据、缺乏表明筛查无害的证据,以及/或缺乏关于最有效筛查工具的共识,许多专业组织都不建议普遍进行亲密伴侣暴力筛查。缺乏支持干预的证据也构成了筛查的另一个障碍。美国妇产科医师学会一直强烈主张普遍进行亲密伴侣暴力筛查,即使其他组织要么不支持筛查,要么只建议对高危妇女进行筛查。最近发表的数据证实,与常规护理相比,在识别亲密伴侣暴力的受害者方面,筛查在怀孕期间和非孕妇中更可靠。同样,最近发表的数据表明,筛查亲密伴侣暴力没有明显的危害,而且筛查行为可能对妇女具有赋权作用,并改善她们与医疗保健提供者的关系和信任。尽管有这些发现,但亲密伴侣暴力筛查的实施率仍然很低。最令人鼓舞的是最近的数据表明,对亲密伴侣暴力筛查后进行的干预措施可有效降低抑郁症状和暴力发作的频率,并改善妊娠的某些结局。尽管在哪个筛查工具可能最有效的问题上仍存在共识,但我们强烈要求所有妇产科医生定期对所有妇女进行亲密伴侣暴力筛查,并熟悉可用的社区资源,以帮助那些通过筛查被确定为遭受亲密伴侣暴力的妇女。