• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度胃肠病学家面临的法律障碍。

Legal hurdles for gastroenterologists in India.

作者信息

Nagpal Neeraj

机构信息

Department of Endoscopy, Hope Gastrointestinal Diagnostic Clinic, House No. 1184, Sector 21 B, Chandigarh, 160 022, India.

出版信息

Indian J Gastroenterol. 2017 May;36(3):174-178. doi: 10.1007/s12664-017-0754-4. Epub 2017 May 29.

DOI:10.1007/s12664-017-0754-4
PMID:28553686
Abstract

Litigation and compensation claims have started occurring with increasing frequency against gastroenterologists in India. A study of few such cases decided by Indian Courts shows that commonest reason for allegations of negligence being upheld by Indian Courts is an improper consent being taken. Professional organisations need to focus on these issues more aggressively than has been done in the past. Judgments which do not appear to be in conformity with standard medical practices need to be challenged in higher courts, failing in which they would become precedents for future similar judgments.

摘要

在印度,针对胃肠病学家的诉讼和赔偿索赔事件愈发频繁。一项对印度法院判决的此类少数案例的研究表明,印度法院维持过失指控的最常见原因是未获得恰当的同意。专业组织需要比过去更积极地关注这些问题。那些看似不符合标准医疗惯例的判决需要在上级法院受到质疑,否则它们将成为未来类似判决的先例。

相似文献

1
Legal hurdles for gastroenterologists in India.印度胃肠病学家面临的法律障碍。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2017 May;36(3):174-178. doi: 10.1007/s12664-017-0754-4. Epub 2017 May 29.
2
The Indian dental litigation landscape: An analysis of judgments on dental negligence claims in Indian Consumer Redressal Forums.印度牙科诉讼情况:对印度消费者申诉论坛中牙科医疗过失索赔判决的分析
J Forensic Leg Med. 2019 Nov;68:101863. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2019.101863. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
3
Trend of Malpractice Litigation against Neurosurgeons in Japan: An Analysis of Disclosed Database by Courts in Japan from 2001 through 2015.日本神经外科医生医疗事故诉讼趋势:对日本法院2001年至2015年公开数据库的分析
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2017 Aug 15;57(8):426-432. doi: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2017-0049. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
4
Association between civil procedure and medical malpractice litigation in Japan.日本民事诉讼与医疗事故诉讼之间的关联
Med Law. 2004;23(2):269-88.
5
Standard of care and liability in medical malpractice litigation in Japan.日本医疗事故诉讼中的医疗护理标准与责任
Health Policy. 2003 Aug;65(2):119-27. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(02)00214-2.
6
Analysis of clinical negligence claims following tonsillectomy in England 1995 to 2010.1995年至2010年英格兰扁桃体切除术后临床疏忽索赔分析。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012 May;121(5):337-40. doi: 10.1177/000348941212100509.
7
[Faults and failure of tonsil surgery and other standard procedures in otorhinolaryngology].[耳鼻喉科扁桃体手术及其他标准手术的失误与失败]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2013 Apr;92 Suppl 1:S33-72. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1333253. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
8
Supreme Court orders highest ever compensation in case of medical negligence.
Natl Med J India. 2013 Nov-Dec;26(6):380-1.
9
Medico-legal implications for the colon perforation during colonoscopy.结肠镜检查致结肠穿孔的医学法律责任
J Forensic Leg Med. 2021 May;80:102185. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2021.102185. Epub 2021 May 12.
10
Influencing factors leading to malpractice litigation in radical prostatectomy.导致前列腺癌根治术医疗事故诉讼的影响因素。
J Urol. 2014 Jun;191(6):1770-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Malpractice claims for endoscopy.内窥镜检查的医疗事故索赔。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Apr 16;5(4):169-73. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i4.169.