Mental Health Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Menninger Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017 Dec;42(13):2567-2574. doi: 10.1038/npp.2017.106. Epub 2017 May 29.
Riluzole is a glutamate-modulating agent with neuroprotective properties approved for use in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The efficacy and safety of riluzole vs placebo as an adjunct to antidepressant medication in outpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD) was examined in a 3-site, 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose trial using a sequential parallel comparison design comprised of two phases of 4 weeks. Patients with MDD in a current major depressive episode (N=104) with an inadequate response to either a prospective or a historical trial of an antidepressant medication were randomized in a 2 : 3 : 3 ratio to the treatment sequences of riluzole/riluzole, placebo/placebo, and placebo/riluzole, respectively. The primary outcome was change in depression severity, as assessed by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Secondary efficacy outcomes included the response rate, defined as at least a 50% improvement in MADRS, Clinical Global Impressions severity and improvement subscales, and patient-reported measures of depression and cognitive function. Eighty-five patients completed the randomized treatment phases. Treatment groups did not differ in mean change in MADRS scores, response rate, or in any secondary efficacy outcomes. Riluzole was generally well tolerated, with a side effect profile consistent with its clinical use. In conclusion, a fixed dose of riluzole (100 mg/day) did not show adjunctive antidepressant efficacy compared to placebo. The trial was adequately powered to detect a moderate riluzole effect, and the risk for exaggerated placebo responses was mitigated. The lack of efficacy suggests that mechanisms underlying riluzole's neuroprotective effects are insufficient for clinical response in treatment-resistant depression.
利鲁唑是一种具有神经保护作用的谷氨酸调节剂,已被批准用于肌萎缩侧索硬化症。在一项 3 个地点、8 周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、固定剂量试验中,使用由 2 个 4 周阶段组成的连续平行比较设计,评估了利鲁唑与安慰剂作为抗抑郁药辅助治疗门诊重度抑郁症(MDD)患者的疗效和安全性。当前有一次重度抑郁发作的 MDD 患者(N=104),对前瞻性或历史抗抑郁药物试验反应不足,他们按照利鲁唑/利鲁唑、安慰剂/安慰剂和安慰剂/利鲁唑的治疗顺序,以 2:3:3 的比例随机分组。主要结局是用蒙哥马利-Åsberg 抑郁评定量表(MADRS)评估的抑郁严重程度变化。次要疗效结局包括反应率,定义为 MADRS 至少改善 50%,临床总体印象严重程度和改善子量表,以及患者报告的抑郁和认知功能测量。85 例患者完成了随机治疗阶段。治疗组之间的 MADRS 评分平均变化、反应率或任何次要疗效结局均无差异。利鲁唑总体耐受良好,副作用谱与其临床应用一致。总之,与安慰剂相比,固定剂量的利鲁唑(100mg/天)并未显示出辅助抗抑郁作用。该试验具有足够的效力来检测中等强度的利鲁唑作用,并且减轻了夸大的安慰剂反应风险。缺乏疗效表明,利鲁唑的神经保护作用的机制不足以对治疗抵抗性抑郁症产生临床反应。