Suppr超能文献

一项关于拉莫三嗪作为治疗抵抗性单相抑郁增效剂的双盲安慰剂对照试验。

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of lamotrigine as an antidepressant augmentation agent in treatment-refractory unipolar depression.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;72(10):1405-12. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09m05355gre.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous reports have suggested that lamotrigine is effective as an antidepressant augmentation agent in patients with treatment-resistant unipolar depression. This study is the largest double-blind placebo-controlled study conducted to date of lamotrigine in this role.

METHOD

In this multicenter trial, conducted at 19 sites, patients aged 18-65 years with a DSM-IV/ICD-10 diagnosis of unipolar, nonpsychotic major depressive disorder (confirmed by the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview) who had failed at least 1 adequate trial of an antidepressant (N = 183) were first treated for 8 weeks with open-label paroxetine or paroxetine controlled-release in dosages up to 50 mg/d or 62.5 mg/d, respectively. Individuals with a 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) score ≥ 15 (n = 96) were then randomized on a double-blind basis to receive either placebo or lamotrigine in dosages titrated upward to a maximum of 400 mg/d for 10 weeks. Sixty-five patients completed the study. The primary outcome measure was the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the main secondary outcome measures were the HDRS-17 and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) and Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement (CGI-I) ratings. Data were collected from 2003 to 2006.

RESULTS

Results of the primary efficacy analysis of the randomized patients using the MADRS, HDRS-17, CGI-S, and CGI-I did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference between lamotrigine and placebo groups, although some secondary analyses were suggestive of efficacy, particularly in those patients who completed the study (completer analysis) and in more severely ill patients (HDRS-17 ≥ 25).

CONCLUSIONS

This add-on study of patients with treatment-resistant depression failed to detect a statistically significant difference between lamotrigine and placebo given for 10 weeks. However, post hoc analyses suggest that future studies of lamotrigine's efficacy might focus on specific subgroups with depression.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00901407.

摘要

背景

先前的报告表明,拉莫三嗪作为一种治疗难治性单相抑郁的增效药物是有效的。本研究是迄今为止对拉莫三嗪在这一作用中进行的最大的双盲安慰剂对照研究。

方法

在这项多中心试验中,在 19 个地点进行,年龄在 18-65 岁之间的 DSM-IV/ICD-10 诊断为单相、非精神病性重性抑郁障碍(通过 Mini-国际神经精神访谈确认)的患者,他们至少经历了 1 种充分的抗抑郁药物试验失败(N=183),首先接受开放标签帕罗西汀或帕罗西汀控释治疗,剂量分别高达 50mg/d 或 62.5mg/d。17 项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HDRS-17)评分≥15 分的个体(n=96)随后随机分为双盲组,接受安慰剂或拉莫三嗪治疗,剂量逐渐增加至最高 400mg/d,共 10 周。65 例患者完成了研究。主要疗效测量指标为蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS),主要次要疗效测量指标为 HDRS-17、临床总体印象-严重程度(CGI-S)和临床总体印象-改善(CGI-I)评分。数据收集于 2003 年至 2006 年。

结果

使用 MADRS、HDRS-17、CGI-S 和 CGI-I 对随机患者进行的主要疗效分析的结果表明,拉莫三嗪组和安慰剂组之间没有统计学上的显著差异,尽管一些二次分析提示有效,特别是在完成研究的患者(完成者分析)和病情较重的患者(HDRS-17≥25)中。

结论

这项对治疗抵抗性抑郁患者的附加研究未能检测到拉莫三嗪与安慰剂在 10 周内的统计学差异。然而,事后分析表明,未来对拉莫三嗪疗效的研究可能集中在具有抑郁的特定亚组。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00901407。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验