a Setor de Perícia em Saúde, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UNIRIO) , Rio de Janeiro , Brazil.
b Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IPUB/UFRJ) , Rio de Janeiro , Brazil.
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2017 Nov;21(4):266-270. doi: 10.1080/13651501.2017.1324991. Epub 2017 May 30.
Although many studies have explored the effect of current affective episodes on insight into bipolar disorder, the potential interaction between current mood state and previous affective episodes has not been consistently investigated.
To explore the influence of dominant polarity, number of previous affective episodes and current affective state on insight in bipolar disorder patients in euthymia or mania.
A total of 101 patients with bipolar disorder were recruited for the study, including 58 patients in euthymia (30 with no defined predominant polarity and 28 with manic predominant polarity) and 43 in mania (26 with no defined predominant polarity and 17 with manic predominant polarity). Patients underwent a clinical assessment and insight was evaluated through the Insight Scale for Affective Disorders.
Bipolar disorder patients in mania had worse insight than those in euthymia, with no effect of dominant polarity. In addition, positive psychotic symptoms showed a significant effect on insight and its inclusion as a covariate eliminated differences related to mood state. Finally, the number of previous manic or depressive episodes did not correlate with insight level.
Mania is a predictor of loss of insight into bipolar disorder. However, it is possible that its contribution is linked to the more frequent presence of psychotic symptoms in this state. Dominant polarity and number/type of previous affective episodes have a limited impact on insight.
尽管许多研究探讨了当前情感发作对双相情感障碍认知的影响,但当前情绪状态与既往情感发作之间的潜在相互作用尚未得到一致研究。
探讨在双相情感障碍患者处于轻躁狂或躁狂时,主要极性、既往情感发作次数和当前情感状态对认知的影响。
共纳入 101 例双相情感障碍患者,其中 58 例处于轻躁狂(30 例无明确主要极性,28 例躁狂主要极性),43 例处于躁狂(26 例无明确主要极性,17 例躁狂主要极性)。患者接受临床评估,通过情感障碍认知量表评估认知。
躁狂患者的认知比轻躁狂患者差,主要极性无影响。此外,阳性精神病症状对认知有显著影响,将其作为协变量纳入后,消除了与情绪状态相关的差异。最后,既往躁狂或抑郁发作次数与认知水平无关。
躁狂是双相情感障碍认知丧失的预测因素。然而,其贡献可能与该状态下更频繁出现精神病症状有关。主要极性和既往情感发作次数/类型对认知的影响有限。