Gnauck Maja, Magnusson Tomas, Ekberg EwaCarin
a Department of Stomatognathic Physiology , Specialist Dental Care Center, Public Dental Service , Växjö , Sweden.
b School of Health and Welfare , Jönköping University , Jönköping , Sweden.
Acta Odontol Scand. 2017 Aug;75(6):429-436. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2017.1331373. Epub 2017 May 29.
The aim of this study was to investigate knowledge and competence in temporomandibular disorders (TMD) among dentists and dental hygienists working in the public dental service (PDS) in Sweden.
The study population comprised all general dentists (n = 110) and dental hygienists (n = 80) working in the PDS in two Swedish counties: Kronoberg (K) and Blekinge (B). The participants filled out a questionnaire comprised of 15 questions.
The results of these questions are presented. The overall response rate for the general dentists was 87%, while the rate for the dental hygienists was 71%. Statistically significant differences between the general dentists in the two counties were found regarding the following: education in the field of TMD over the last 5 years (K: 37%, B: 73%), evaluation of occlusion when examining patients with suspected TMD ('always': K: 61%, B: 82%), and a desire for consultation of the OFP (orofacial pain)/TMD specialist by telephone (K: 71%, B: 44%). Regarding the dental hygienists, there was a statistically significant difference concerning the use of the treatment modality 'reassurance' (K: 41%, B: 7%).
The majority of the dental care providers in both counties - irrespective of professional category - had a positive attitude towards patients with TMD. Knowledge and competence in the field are sparse and require postgraduate education. There is a great need of an OFP/TMD specialist for more complicated patients and a need to implement updated knowledge and competence in the PDS in these two counties.
本研究旨在调查瑞典公共牙科服务机构(PDS)中牙医和口腔卫生士对颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)的知识和能力。
研究人群包括在瑞典两个县(克鲁努贝里县(K)和布莱金厄县(B))的PDS工作的所有普通牙医(n = 110)和口腔卫生士(n = 80)。参与者填写了一份包含15个问题的问卷。
呈现了这些问题的结果。普通牙医的总体回复率为87%,而口腔卫生士的回复率为71%。在以下方面发现两个县的普通牙医之间存在统计学上的显著差异:过去5年中TMD领域的教育情况(K:37%,B:73%)、检查疑似TMD患者时对咬合的评估(“总是”:K:61%,B:82%)以及通过电话咨询口腔颌面疼痛(OFP)/TMD专家的意愿(K:71%,B:44%)。关于口腔卫生士,在治疗方式“安慰”的使用方面存在统计学上的显著差异(K:41%,B:7%)。
两个县的大多数牙科护理人员——无论专业类别如何——对TMD患者都持积极态度。该领域的知识和能力匮乏,需要研究生教育。对于更复杂的患者,非常需要OFP/TMD专家,并且需要在这两个县的PDS中实施更新的知识和能力。