Elnagar Mohammed H, Elshourbagy Eman, Ghobashy Safaa, Khedr Mohamed, Evans Carla A
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt; Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Ill.
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Jun;151(6):1092-1106. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.10.038.
The aim of this study was to evaluate dentoalveolar and arch dimension changes in 2 miniplate-anchored maxillary protraction protocols in relation to an untreated control group using 3-dimensional digital models.
Thirty growing Class III subjects with maxillary deficiency in the late mixed or early permanent dentition phase were randomly divided into 3 groups. In group 1 (n = 10), patients were treated with skeletally anchored facemasks anchored with miniplates placed at the zygomatic buttress. In group 2 (n = 10), patients were treated with Class III elastics extending from infrazygomatic miniplates in the maxilla to symphyseal miniplates in the mandible. Group 3 (n = 10) was an untreated control group. The decision to discontinue orthopedic treatment was made when the patients had 3 to 4 mm of positive anterior overjet. Pretreatment, posttreatment, and observation 3-dimensional digital models were analyzed, superimposed, 3 dimensionally mapped, and sectioned.
In this study, there were no significant changes in maxillary arch depth and maxillary or mandibular intermolar width before and after maxillary protraction or after the observation period in the control group. The mandibular arch depth decreased by a small but statistically significant amount only in groups 1 and 3. Superimposition of the pretreatment and posttreatment or observation maxillary 3-dimensional digital models showed minimal clinically significant dentoalveolar changes.
Miniplate-anchored maxillary protraction protocols can accomplish maxillary advancement by eliminating movements of teeth and dentoalveolar changes. No spontaneous improvement in transverse deficiency was detected after correction of the anteroposterior deficiency at this age. Consequently, patients with transverse maxillary deficiency should have rapid maxillary expansion before or during the miniplate-anchored protraction period to improve the transverse deficiency.
本研究旨在使用三维数字模型,评估两种微型钛板固定上颌前牵引方案中牙牙槽骨和牙弓尺寸的变化,并与未治疗的对照组进行比较。
30名处于混合牙列晚期或恒牙列早期、上颌骨发育不足的Ⅲ类生长发育期患者被随机分为3组。第1组(n = 10),患者使用微型钛板固定在颧突处的骨锚式面罩进行治疗。第2组(n = 10),患者使用Ⅲ类弹性牵引,从上颌的颧下微型钛板延伸至下颌的颏联合微型钛板。第3组(n = 10)为未治疗的对照组。当患者前牙覆盖有3至4毫米的正向覆盖时,决定停止正畸治疗。对治疗前、治疗后和观察期的三维数字模型进行分析、叠加、三维映射和切片。
在本研究中,对照组在上颌前牵引前后或观察期后,上颌牙弓深度、上颌或下颌磨牙间宽度均无显著变化。仅在第1组和第3组中,下颌牙弓深度有小幅但具有统计学意义的下降。治疗前与治疗后或观察期上颌三维数字模型的叠加显示,临床上牙牙槽骨变化极小。
微型钛板固定上颌前牵引方案可通过消除牙齿移动和牙牙槽骨变化来实现上颌前突。在这个年龄段,纠正前后向发育不足后,未检测到横向发育不足的自发改善。因此,上颌横向发育不足的患者应在微型钛板固定前牵引期之前或期间进行快速上颌扩弓,以改善横向发育不足。