文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

三维比较评估骨锚定式与牙支抗式上颌骨前牵引治疗骨性 III 类错颌畸形患者的效果。

Three-dimensional comparative evaluation of customized bone-anchored vs tooth-borne maxillary protraction in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Department of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Sep;160(3):374-384. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.04.034. Epub 2021 Jun 23.


DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.04.034
PMID:34172344
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the 3-dimensional skeletal and dental effects induced by a new maxillary protraction approach using customized miniplates for anchorage compared with a control group of traditional tooth-borne maxillary protraction. METHODS: Forty-one growing patients at prepubescent stage with skeletal Class III malocclusion participated in this study. These patients were randomly split into 2 groups. In group 1 (n = 20), patients underwent maxillary protraction anchored with customized miniplates. The miniplates were individually designed and inserted using the surgical templates. In group 2 (n = 21), patients underwent tooth-borne maxillary protraction. Pretreatment and posttreatment cone-beam computed tomography scans were obtained, and 30 measurements of cone-beam computed tomography images were acquired and calculated. The changes after treatment and the comparison of the 2 groups were assessed. RESULTS: After maxillary protraction, group 1 showed a greater forward movement of the maxilla than group 2. The maxilla length increased more in group 1 than in group 2. The rotations of the palatal and mandibular planes in group 1 were less than those in group 2. In group 1, the maxillary incisors proclined less, the mandibular incisors retroclined less, and the maxillary first molars extruded less. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with tooth-borne maxillary protraction, customized miniplates anchored maxillary protraction produced more maxillary growth, fewer dental changes, and less maxillary and mandibular plane rotation.

摘要

简介:本前瞻性研究旨在评估使用定制微型板作为锚定的新型上颌前牵引方法与传统牙支抗上颌前牵引相比引起的三维骨骼和牙齿变化。

方法:41 名处于青春期前阶段的骨骼 III 类错牙合患者参与了本研究。这些患者被随机分为两组。在第 1 组(n=20)中,患者采用定制微型板固定的上颌前牵引。微型板是使用手术模板单独设计和插入的。在第 2 组(n=21)中,患者采用牙支抗上颌前牵引。获得治疗前和治疗后的锥形束 CT 扫描,并获取和计算 30 个锥形束 CT 图像的测量值。评估治疗后的变化和两组之间的比较。

结果:上颌前牵引后,第 1 组上颌的前向移动大于第 2 组。第 1 组的上颌长度增加多于第 2 组。第 1 组的腭平面和下颌平面旋转小于第 2 组。在第 1 组中,上颌切牙的前倾度较小,下颌切牙的后倾度较小,上颌第一磨牙的外倾度较小。

结论:与牙支抗上颌前牵引相比,定制微型板固定的上颌前牵引可产生更多的上颌生长、更少的牙齿变化以及更少的上颌和下颌平面旋转。

相似文献

[1]
Three-dimensional comparative evaluation of customized bone-anchored vs tooth-borne maxillary protraction in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021-9

[2]
Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.

Prog Orthod. 2015

[3]
Comparison of skeletal anchorage and tooth-borne maxillary protraction followed by fixed appliance in Class III malocclusion.

Eur J Orthod. 2020-4-1

[4]
Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014-1

[5]
Treatment effects of maxillary protraction with palatal plates vs conventional tooth-borne anchorage in growing patients with Class III malocclusion.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022-10

[6]
Maxillary protraction with miniplates providing skeletal anchorage in a growing Class III patient.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011-1

[7]
Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary changes associated with facemask and rapid maxillary expansion compared with bone anchored maxillary protraction.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013-11

[8]
Three-phase treatment concept for skeletal Class III growing patients with severe space deficiency: A report of three cases with skeletally anchored maxillary protraction.

J Formos Med Assoc. 2020-4

[9]
Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vs expansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: a single-center, randomized controlled trial.

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015-10

[10]
Dentofacial and skeletal effects of two orthodontic maxillary protraction protocols: bone anchors versus facemask.

Head Face Med. 2024-10-18

引用本文的文献

[1]
Three-Dimensional Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)-Derived Soft Tissue Changes in Patients with Unilateral Cleft Lip, Alveolus, and Palate with Midfacial Deficiency after 1.5 Years of Bone-Anchored Maxillary Protraction.

J Clin Med. 2024-5-14

[2]
Orthodontic treatment for prominent lower front teeth (Class III malocclusion) in children.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-4-10

[3]
Maxillofacial growth changes after maxillary protraction therapy in children with class III malocclusion: a dual control group retrospective study.

BMC Oral Health. 2024-1-3

[4]
Zygomaticotemporal suture maturation evaluation in Chinese population using cone-beam computed tomography images.

Korean J Orthod. 2023-7-25

[5]
Effects of maxillary expansion and protraction on pharyngeal airway dimensions in relation to changes in head posture and hyoid position : A retrospective cohort study.

J Orofac Orthop. 2023-10

[6]
[A cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of three-dimensional changes of circummaxillary sutures following maxillary protraction with alternate rapid palatal expansions and constrictions].

Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022-4-18

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索