Urner Esther, Delavy Martine, Catarino Rosa, Viviano Manuela, Meyer-Hamme Ulrike, Benski Anne-Caroline, Jinoro Jeromine, Heriniainasolo Josea Lea, Undurraga Manuela, De Vuyst Hugo, Combescure Christophe, Vassilakos Pierre, Petignat Patrick
Gynecology Division, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Laboratory Division, Saint Damien Healthcare Centre, Ambanja, Madagascar.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2017 May 29;5(5):e72. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.6697.
Sub-Saharan African countries are marked by a high incidence of cervical cancer. Madagascar ranks 11th among the countries with the highest cervical cancer incidence worldwide.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the performances of digital smartphone-based visual inspection with acetic acid (D-VIA) and Lugol's iodine (D-VILI) for diagnosing cervical precancer and cancer.
Human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive women recruited through a cervical screening campaign had D-VIA and D-VILI examinations with endocervical curettage (ECC) and cervical biopsy. Three images were captured for each woman (native, D-VIA, D-VILI) using a smartphone camera. The images were randomly coded and distributed on 2 online databases (Google Forms). The D-VIA form included native and D-VIA images, and the D-VILI form included native and D-VILI images. Pathological cases were defined as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+). Physicians rated the images as non-pathological or pathological. Using the ECC and cervical biopsy results as references, the sensitivity and specificity of D-VIA and D-VILI examinations for each and all physicians were calculated.
Altogether, 15 clinicians assessed 240 images. Sensitivity was higher for the D-VIA interpretations (94.1%; 95% CI 81.6-98.3) than for the D-VILI interpretations (78.8%; 95% CI 54.1-92.1; P=.009). In contrast, the specificity was higher for the D-VILI interpretations (56.4%; 95% CI 38.3-72.9) than for the D-VIA interpretations (50.4%; 95% CI 35.9-64.8; P=.005).
Smartphone-based image for triage of HPV-positive women is more accurate for detecting CIN2+ lesions with D-VIA than D-VILI, although with a small loss of specificity.
撒哈拉以南非洲国家宫颈癌发病率很高。马达加斯加在全球宫颈癌发病率最高的国家中排名第11位。
本研究旨在评估基于数字智能手机的醋酸视觉检查(D-VIA)和卢戈氏碘视觉检查(D-VILI)在诊断宫颈上皮内瘤变和癌症方面的性能。
通过宫颈筛查活动招募的人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)阳性女性接受了D-VIA和D-VILI检查,并进行了宫颈管刮术(ECC)和宫颈活检。使用智能手机摄像头为每位女性拍摄三张图像(原始图像、D-VIA图像、D-VILI图像)。图像被随机编码并分布在2个在线数据库(谷歌表单)上。D-VIA表单包括原始图像和D-VIA图像,D-VILI表单包括原始图像和D-VILI图像。病理病例定义为宫颈上皮内瘤变2级或更严重(CIN2+)。医生将图像评为非病理或病理。以ECC和宫颈活检结果为参考,计算每位医生和所有医生的D-VIA和D-VILI检查的敏感性和特异性。
共有15名临床医生评估了240张图像。D-VIA解读的敏感性(94.1%;95%CI 81.6-98.3)高于D-VILI解读(78.8%;95%CI 54.1-92.1;P=0.009)。相比之下,D-VILI解读的特异性(56.4%;95%CI 38.3-72.9)高于D-VIA解读(50.4%;95%CI 35.9-64.8;P=0.005)。
基于智能手机的图像用于HPV阳性女性的分流,使用D-VIA检测CIN2+病变比D-VILI更准确,尽管特异性略有损失。