Lofsvold David
Committee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, 915 E. 57th, St. Chicago, IL, 60637.
Evolution. 1986 May;40(3):559-573. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00507.x.
Phenotypic and additive genetic covariance matrices were estimated for 15 morphometric characters in three species and subspecies of Peromyscus. Univariate and multivariate ANOVAs indicate these groups are highly diverged in all characters, P. leucopus having the largest body size, P. maniculatus bairdii the smallest, and P. maniculatus nebrascensis being intermediate. Comparing the structure of P and G within each taxon revealed significant similarities in all three cases. This proportionality was strong enough to justify using P in the place of G to analyze evolutionary processes using quantitative genetic models when G can not be estimated, as in fossil material. However, the similarity between genetic and phenotypic covariance structures is sufficiently low that estimates of the genetic parameters should be used when possible. The additive genetic covariance matrices were compared to examine the assumption that they remain constant during evolution, an assumption which underlies many applications of quantitative-genetic models. While matrix permutation tests indicated statistically significant proportionality between the genetic covariance structures of the two P. maniculatus subspecies, there is no evidence of significant genetic structural similarity between species. This result suggests that the assumption of constant genetic covariance structure may be valid only within species. (It does not, however, necessarily imply a causal relationship between speciation and heterogeneity of genetic covariance structures.) The low matrix correlation for the two P. maniculatus subspecies' genetic covariance matrices indicates G may not be functionally constant, even within species. The lack of similarity observed here may be due partly to sampling variation.
对鹿鼠属的三个物种和亚种的15个形态测量特征估计了表型和加性遗传协方差矩阵。单变量和多变量方差分析表明,这些群体在所有特征上都高度分化,白足鼠的体型最大,拜氏鹿鼠的体型最小,内布拉斯加鹿鼠处于中间。比较每个分类单元内P和G的结构发现在所有三种情况下都有显著的相似性。这种比例性足够强,足以证明在无法估计G(如化石材料)时,使用P代替G来利用数量遗传模型分析进化过程是合理的。然而,遗传协方差结构和表型协方差结构之间的相似性足够低,因此应尽可能使用遗传参数估计值。比较加性遗传协方差矩阵以检验它们在进化过程中保持不变的假设,这一假设是许多数量遗传模型应用的基础。虽然矩阵置换检验表明两个鹿鼠亚种的遗传协方差结构之间存在统计学上显著的比例性,但没有证据表明物种之间存在显著的遗传结构相似性。这一结果表明,遗传协方差结构恒定的假设可能仅在物种内部有效。(然而,这并不一定意味着物种形成与遗传协方差结构的异质性之间存在因果关系。)两个鹿鼠亚种的遗传协方差矩阵的低矩阵相关性表明,即使在物种内部,G也可能在功能上不是恒定的。这里观察到的缺乏相似性可能部分归因于抽样变异。