Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Psychology, Stanford University, USA.
Dev Sci. 2018 Mar;21(2). doi: 10.1111/desc.12529. Epub 2017 May 30.
The relationship between childhood socioeconomic status (SES) and executive function (EF) has recently attracted attention within psychology, following reports of substantial SES disparities in children's EF. Adding to the importance of this relationship, EF has been proposed as a mediator of socioeconomic disparities in lifelong achievement and health. However, evidence about the relationship between childhood SES and EF is mixed, and there has been no systematic attempt to evaluate this relationship across studies. This meta-analysis systematically reviewed the literature for studies in which samples of children varying in SES were evaluated on EF, including studies with and without primary hypotheses about SES. The analysis included 8760 children between the ages of 2 and 18 gathered from 25 independent samples. Analyses showed a small but statistically significant correlation between SES and EF across all studies (r = .16, 95% CI [.12, .21]) without correcting for attenuation owing to range restriction or measurement unreliability. Substantial heterogeneity was observed among studies, and a number of factors, including the amount of SES variability in the sample and the number of EF measures used, emerged as moderators. Using only the 15 studies with meaningful SES variability in the sample, the average correlation between SES and EF was small-to-medium in size (r = .22, 95% CI [.17, .27]). Using only the six studies with multiple measures of EF, the relationship was medium in size (r = .28, 95% CI [.18, .37]). In sum, this meta-analysis supports the presence of SES disparities in EF and suggests that they are between small and medium in size, depending on the methods used to measure them.
儿童社会经济地位(SES)与执行功能(EF)之间的关系最近在心理学领域引起了关注,此前有报道称儿童 EF 存在大量 SES 差异。此外,EF 被认为是终身成就和健康方面社会经济差异的中介,这进一步增加了这种关系的重要性。然而,关于儿童 SES 与 EF 之间关系的证据喜忧参半,而且还没有系统地试图在研究之间评估这种关系。本荟萃分析系统地回顾了 SES 不同的儿童在 EF 上进行评估的样本的研究文献,包括有和没有 SES 主要假设的研究。该分析包括来自 25 个独立样本的 8760 名 2 至 18 岁的儿童。分析表明,所有研究中 SES 和 EF 之间存在微弱但具有统计学意义的相关性(r=.16,95%CI [.12,.21]),而没有校正由于范围限制或测量不可靠导致的衰减。研究之间存在很大的异质性,一些因素,包括样本中 SES 变化量和使用的 EF 测量数量,成为了调节因素。仅使用样本中 SES 有明显变化的 15 项研究,SES 和 EF 之间的平均相关性属于小到中等大小(r=.22,95%CI [.17,.27])。仅使用 EF 的六项具有多种测量的研究,关系大小为中等(r=.28,95%CI [.18,.37])。总之,本荟萃分析支持 EF 中存在 SES 差异,并表明这些差异的大小介于小到中等,具体取决于用于测量它们的方法。