Daniels Sarah, Wei Hua, Clayson Anne, van Tongeren Martie, Bannan Thomas, Carder Melanie, Munford Luke, Gartland Nicola
Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 18;13:1550439. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1550439. eCollection 2025.
Environmental factors such as poor air quality may exacerbate health inequalities among children. This study aimed to explore stakeholders' views on the impact of environmental and socio-economic factors on children's health and learning, and the effectiveness of local air quality initiatives.
Between April and June 2024, we conducted 15 semi-structured interviews with primary school teachers, local government and transport representatives from Greater Manchester (GM), a city region with high levels of deprivation in the Northwest of England. Inductive thematic analysis was completed using NVivo14.
Four key themes were identified: (1) health and developmental concerns for GM primary school children, (2) factors associated with children's health and development, (3) ongoing initiatives to improve air quality in and around schools, including whether and how such initiatives were evaluated, and the perceived effectiveness, barriers and facilitators of the initiatives, (4) key priorities for future research. Concerns over children's health and development including children's learning, road safety, physical health, attendance, and mental wellbeing were frequently expressed. Participant views about air quality as a contributing factor to children's health and development were mixed. Participants also expressed concern over socio-economic factors affecting children's health and development, including deprivation, housing conditions, and access to green spaces. The identified air quality initiatives mainly targeted traffic reduction and active travel, but evaluation of initiatives faced challenges, particularly time constraints hindering data collection, and there were mixed opinions on effectiveness. Barriers to implementation included parental resistance, busy schedules and road safety concerns. Community engagement and involvement of children were seen as facilitators, but funding and sustained local government support were challenges. The rise in Special Educational Needs (SEN) and cognitive issues, particularly evident post-COVID, and the role of environmental factors was considered as a gap in knowledge.
This study highlights the complex relationship between air pollution, socio-economic disparities, and children's health in GM. Inequitable resources and behavioral resistance hinder progress, but stronger stakeholder collaboration and evidence-based strategies can help. The post-COVID rise in SEN and learning difficulties calls for research. Future studies should adopt multidisciplinary, longitudinal approaches to assess the long-term impact of air quality initiatives.
空气质量差等环境因素可能会加剧儿童健康方面的不平等。本研究旨在探讨利益相关者对环境和社会经济因素对儿童健康与学习的影响以及当地空气质量举措有效性的看法。
2024年4月至6月期间,我们对来自大曼彻斯特(GM)的小学教师、地方政府和交通代表进行了15次半结构化访谈,大曼彻斯特是英格兰西北部一个贫困程度较高的城市区域。使用NVivo14完成了归纳主题分析。
确定了四个关键主题:(1)大曼彻斯特小学儿童的健康和发育问题;(2)与儿童健康和发育相关的因素;(3)改善学校内外空气质量的现行举措,包括这些举措是否以及如何进行评估,以及这些举措的感知有效性、障碍和促进因素;(4)未来研究的关键优先事项。人们经常表达对儿童健康和发育的担忧,包括儿童学习、道路安全、身体健康、出勤率和心理健康。参与者对空气质量作为儿童健康和发育的一个促成因素的看法不一。参与者还对影响儿童健康和发育的社会经济因素表示担忧,包括贫困、住房条件和绿色空间的可及性。确定的空气质量举措主要针对减少交通流量和鼓励绿色出行,但举措的评估面临挑战,特别是时间限制阻碍了数据收集,而且对有效性的看法不一。实施的障碍包括家长的抵制、日程繁忙和道路安全问题。社区参与和儿童的参与被视为促进因素,但资金和地方政府的持续支持是挑战。特殊教育需求(SEN)和认知问题的增加,尤其是在新冠疫情之后明显增加,以及环境因素的作用被认为是知识空白。
本研究凸显了大曼彻斯特空气污染、社会经济差距与儿童健康之间的复杂关系。资源分配不均和行为上的抵制阻碍了进展,但更强有力的利益相关者合作和基于证据的策略会有所帮助。新冠疫情后特殊教育需求和学习困难的增加需要进行研究。未来的研究应采用多学科、纵向的方法来评估空气质量举措的长期影响。