• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心内膜导线患者静脉狭窄和闭塞的性别差异。

Sex differences in venous stenosis and occlusion in patients with endocardial leads.

作者信息

Boczar Krzysztof, Dębski Maciej, Ząbek Andrzej, Haberka Kazimierz, Sławuta Agnieszka, Lelakowski Jacek, Małecka Barbara

机构信息

Department of Electrocardiology, John Paul II Hospital, Cracow, Poland.

Department of Cardiology, County Hospital, Kłodzko, Poland.

出版信息

Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2017 May 23;42(251):187-192.

PMID:28557964
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Venous stenosis and occlusion (VSO) in the presence of endocardial leads constitute one of the complications of permanent cardiac pacing. At present there are no scientific reports on the influence of sex on the incidence of VSO.

AIM

The aim of the study was to examine the influence of sex on the incidence of VSO in patients with earlier implanted endocardial leads in a single-center retrospective analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The material consists of 284 records of consecutive patients admitted to hospital to undergo electrotherapy procedures. In all patients a contrast venography for ipsilateral venous confluence was performed before the procedure. Patients were divided into two groups according to sex criterion. Groups were compared concerning following parameters: demographic characteristics, cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) characteristics, comorbidities, CHA2DS2-VASc score, selected risk factors for VSO.

RESULTS

Group I consist of 101 females, whereas group II consist of 183 males. Both groups did not differ significantly for age, number of implanted endocardial leads and lead dwell time. In the cohort males were with significantly greater burden of morbidity, reflected by the mean result of CHA2DS2-VASc (P=0.0098). In males there was significantly more often chronic heart failure (P<0.0001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P=0.0450) and tobacco use (P=0.0159). Males had more ICD implanted than females (P=0.0270). In the examine cohort 88 patients (31%) had VSO. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of presence of VSO between females and males (P=0.4685). The detailed analysis of the patients with VSO divided according to sex revealed higher morbidity in males.

CONCLUSIONS

The equality of VSO incidence in groups of males and females along with the predominance of factors protecting against VSO in group of males support the assumption that female gender is a protective factor against the development of VSO, equally as known protective factors in males.

摘要

未标注

心内膜导线存在时的静脉狭窄和闭塞(VSO)是永久性心脏起搏的并发症之一。目前尚无关于性别对VSO发生率影响的科学报道。

目的

本研究的目的是通过单中心回顾性分析,探讨性别对早期植入心内膜导线患者VSO发生率的影响。

材料与方法

材料包括284例连续入院接受电疗程序的患者记录。所有患者在手术前均进行了同侧静脉汇合造影。根据性别标准将患者分为两组。比较两组的以下参数:人口统计学特征、心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)特征、合并症、CHA2DS2-VASc评分、VSO的选定危险因素。

结果

第一组包括101名女性,而第二组包括183名男性。两组在年龄、植入的心内膜导线数量和导线留置时间方面无显著差异。在队列中,男性的发病负担明显更大,这通过CHA2DS2-VASc的平均结果反映出来(P=0.0098)。男性中慢性心力衰竭(P<0.0001)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(P=0.0450)和吸烟(P=0.0159)的发生率明显更高。男性植入ICD的人数多于女性(P=0.0270)。在研究队列中,88例患者(31%)发生了VSO。女性和男性在VSO存在方面无统计学显著差异(P=0.4685)。按性别划分的VSO患者的详细分析显示男性的发病率更高。

结论

男性和女性组中VSO发生率的平等以及男性组中预防VSO的因素占主导地位,支持了女性性别是预防VSO发生的保护因素这一假设,这与男性中已知的保护因素相同。

相似文献

1
Sex differences in venous stenosis and occlusion in patients with endocardial leads.心内膜导线患者静脉狭窄和闭塞的性别差异。
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2017 May 23;42(251):187-192.
2
The utility of a CHA2DS2-VASc score in predicting the presence of significant stenosis and occlusion of veins with indwelling endocardial leads.CHA2DS2-VASc评分在预测留置心内膜导线时静脉显著狭窄和闭塞情况中的应用。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Sep 1;218:164-169. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.025. Epub 2016 May 14.
3
Venous stenosis and occlusion in the presence of endocardial leads in patients referred for transvenous lead extraction.因经静脉导线拔除术而接受检查的患者,在心内膜导线存在的情况下出现静脉狭窄和闭塞。
Acta Cardiol. 2017 Feb;72(1):61-67. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2017.1281545.
4
Venous Stenosis and Occlusion in the Presence of Endocardial Leads.心内膜导线存在时的静脉狭窄和闭塞
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;25(1):83-91. doi: 10.17219/acem/42317.
5
The role of hemostatic markers as venous stenosis or occlusion predictors following first transvenous cardiac device implantation.止血标志物在首次经静脉心脏装置植入后预测静脉狭窄或闭塞的作用。
Cardiol J. 2021;28(5):690-696. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2019.0030. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
6
Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis and stenosis after implantation of pacemakers and defibrillators; A prospective study.起搏器和除颤器植入术后上肢深静脉血栓形成与狭窄:一项前瞻性研究。
Rom J Intern Med. 2017 Sep 26;55(3):139-144. doi: 10.1515/rjim-2017-0018.
7
Venous Stenosis After Transvenous Lead Placement: A Study of Outcomes and Risk Factors in 212 Consecutive Patients.经静脉植入电极后发生的静脉狭窄:对212例连续患者的结局和危险因素的研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jul 31;4(8):e001878. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.001878.
8
Predictors of venous stenosis or occlusion following first transvenous cardiac device implantation: Prospective observational study.首次经静脉植入心脏装置后静脉狭窄或闭塞的预测因素:前瞻性观察研究。
J Vasc Access. 2019 Sep;20(5):495-500. doi: 10.1177/1129729818815135. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
9
Lead-Dependent Infective Endocarditis: The Role of Factors Predisposing to Its Development in an Analysis of 414 Clinical Cases.铅依赖型感染性心内膜炎:在414例临床病例分析中易患因素对其发病的作用
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Jul;38(7):846-56. doi: 10.1111/pace.12615. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
10
Predictors of venous obstruction following pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: a contrast venographic study on 100 patients admitted for generator change, lead revision, or device upgrade.起搏器或植入式心脏复律除颤器植入术后静脉阻塞的预测因素:一项对100例因更换发生器、导线修复或设备升级而入院患者的静脉造影对比研究。
Europace. 2007 May;9(5):328-32. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum019. Epub 2007 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Are Endovascular Interventions for Central Vein Obstructions due to Cardiac Implanted Electronic Devices Effective?心脏植入电子设备所致中心静脉阻塞的血管内介入治疗是否有效?
Front Surg. 2018 Jul 30;5:49. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2018.00049. eCollection 2018.