Suppr超能文献

因经静脉导线拔除术而接受检查的患者,在心内膜导线存在的情况下出现静脉狭窄和闭塞。

Venous stenosis and occlusion in the presence of endocardial leads in patients referred for transvenous lead extraction.

作者信息

Boczar Krzysztof, Zabek Andrzej, Haberka Kazimierz, Debski Maciej, Rydlewska Anna, Musial Robert, Lelakowski Jacek, Malecka Barbara

机构信息

a Department of Electrocardiology , John Paul II Hospital , Cracow , Poland.

b Department of Medical Intensive Care Unit , John Paul II Hospital , Cracow , Poland.

出版信息

Acta Cardiol. 2017 Feb;72(1):61-67. doi: 10.1080/00015385.2017.1281545.

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of venous stenosis and occlusion (VSO) in patients referred for transvenous lead extraction (TLE) with regard to the indications for this treatment and to analyse the influence of VSO on efficacy, complications and technical challenges of TLE procedures. Methods The material consists of 133 consecutive TLE procedure records. The contrast venography examination of the ipsilateral access vein was performed prior to the operation. The whole study population was divided into two subgroups, based on the presence (subgroup I) or absence (subgroup II) of VSO. Results Phlebography was performed in 133 patients with age ranging from 25.7 to 86.1 years, 44 female (33.1%). The VSO was confirmed in 48 (36.1%) patients - subgroup I. Most of the patients were referred to TLE due to non-infectious reasons (100 pts-75.2%). The absence of VSO was observed substantially more frequently in patients with diabetes (P = 0.02). Procedural success rate reached 93.3% in subgroup I and 98.8% in subgroup II (P = 0.1). There was no significant difference in the use of advanced tools and alternative access sites. Conclusion The presence of VSO can be expected in one third of patients referred for lead extraction. There is no association between indication for TLE (infected or noninfected lead extraction) and the incidence of VSO. Diabetes proved to have a protective effect on venous patency in the previously mentioned group. VSO does not influence the effectiveness, safety, and the use of additional tools during TLE procedures.

摘要

目的 本研究旨在评估因经静脉导线拔除术(TLE)而接受治疗的患者中静脉狭窄和闭塞(VSO)的发生率,并探讨其治疗指征,同时分析VSO对TLE手术疗效、并发症及技术挑战的影响。方法 研究材料包括133例连续的TLE手术记录。术前对同侧入路静脉进行造影检查。根据是否存在VSO将整个研究人群分为两个亚组,即存在VSO的亚组I和不存在VSO的亚组II。结果 对133例年龄在25.7至86.1岁之间的患者进行了静脉造影,其中女性44例(33.1%)。48例(36.1%)患者被确诊为VSO,属于亚组I。大多数患者因非感染性原因接受TLE治疗(100例,占75.2%)。糖尿病患者中VSO的发生率显著较低(P = 0.02)。亚组I的手术成功率为93.3%,亚组II为98.8%(P = 0.1)。在使用先进工具和选择替代入路部位方面,两组之间无显著差异。结论 在接受导线拔除术的患者中,预计三分之一会出现VSO。TLE的指征(感染性或非感染性导线拔除)与VSO的发生率之间无关联。糖尿病对上述人群的静脉通畅具有保护作用。VSO不影响TLE手术的有效性、安全性及额外工具的使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验