Zölch Teresa, Henze Lisa, Keilholz Patrick, Pauleit Stephan
Technical University of Munich, Centre for Urban Ecology and Climate Adaptation, Germany.
Technical University of Munich, Chair for Strategic Landscape Planning and Management, Germany.
Environ Res. 2017 Aug;157:135-144. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.023. Epub 2017 May 27.
Urban development leads to changes of surface cover that disrupt the hydrological cycle in cities. In particular, impermeable surfaces and the removal of vegetation reduce the ability to intercept, store and infiltrate rainwater. Consequently, the volume of stormwater runoff and the risk of local flooding rises. This is further amplified by the anticipated effects of climate change leading to an increased frequency and intensity of heavy rain events. Hence, urban adaptation strategies are required to mitigate those impacts. A nature-based solution, more and more promoted in politics and academia, is urban green infrastructure as it contributes to the resilience of urban ecosystems by providing services to maintain or restore hydrological functions. However, this poses a challenge to urban planners in deciding upon effective adaptation measures as they often lack information on the performance of green infrastructure to moderate surface runoff. It remains unclear what type of green infrastructure (e.g. trees, green roofs), offers the highest potential to reduce discharge volumes and to what extent. Against this background, this study provides an approach to gather quantitative evidence on green infrastructure's regulation potential. We use a micro-scale scenario modelling approach of different variations of green cover under current and future climatic conditions. The scenarios are modelled with MIKE SHE, an integrated hydrological simulation tool, and applied to a high density residential area of perimeter blocks in Munich, Germany. The results reveal that both trees and green roofs increase water storage capacities and hence reduce surface runoff, although the main contribution of trees lies in increasing interception and evapotranspiration, whereas green roofs allow for more retention through water storage in their substrate. With increasing precipitation intensities as projected under climate change their regulating potential decreases due to limited water storage capacities. The performance of both types stays limited to a maximum reduction of 2.4% compared to the baseline scenario, unless the coverage of vegetation and permeable surfaces is significantly increased as a 14.8% reduction is achieved by greening all roof surfaces. We conclude that the study provides empirical support for the effectiveness of urban green infrastructure as nature-based solution to stormwater regulation and assists planners and operators of sewage systems in selecting the most effective measures for implementation and estimation of their effects.
城市发展导致地表覆盖变化,扰乱了城市的水文循环。特别是,不透水表面和植被的清除降低了截留、储存和渗透雨水的能力。因此,雨水径流量和局部洪水风险增加。气候变化的预期影响导致暴雨事件的频率和强度增加,这进一步加剧了这种情况。因此,需要城市适应策略来减轻这些影响。一种在政治和学术界越来越受到推广的基于自然的解决方案是城市绿色基础设施,因为它通过提供维护或恢复水文功能的服务,有助于提高城市生态系统的恢复力。然而,这给城市规划者在决定有效的适应措施时带来了挑战,因为他们往往缺乏关于绿色基础设施调节地表径流性能的信息。目前尚不清楚哪种类型的绿色基础设施(如树木、绿色屋顶)具有最大的减少排放量潜力以及在何种程度上具有该潜力。在此背景下,本研究提供了一种方法来收集关于绿色基础设施调节潜力的定量证据。我们使用微观尺度情景建模方法,模拟当前和未来气候条件下不同绿色覆盖变化情况。这些情景使用综合水文模拟工具MIKE SHE进行建模,并应用于德国慕尼黑周边街区的一个高密度住宅区。结果表明,树木和绿色屋顶都增加了蓄水能力,从而减少了地表径流,尽管树木的主要作用在于增加截留和蒸散,而绿色屋顶则通过在其基质中蓄水实现更多的滞留。随着气候变化预测的降水强度增加,由于蓄水能力有限,它们的调节潜力会降低。与基准情景相比,这两种类型的性能最大降低幅度均为2.4%,除非植被和透水表面的覆盖率显著增加,因为通过绿化所有屋顶表面可实现14.8%的减少。我们得出结论,该研究为城市绿色基础设施作为基于自然的雨水调节解决方案的有效性提供了实证支持,并有助于污水系统的规划者和运营者选择最有效的措施进行实施并评估其效果。