van Wagenberg C P A, de Haas Y, Hogeveen H, van Krimpen M M, Meuwissen M P M, van Middelaar C E, Rodenburg T B
1Wageningen Economic Research,PO-box 29703, 2502LS Den Haag,The Netherlands.
2Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre,Wageningen Livestock Research,PO-box 338, 6700AH Wageningen,The Netherlands.
Animal. 2017 Oct;11(10):1839-1851. doi: 10.1017/S175173111700115X. Epub 2017 May 31.
To sustainably contribute to food security of a growing and richer world population, livestock production systems are challenged to increase production levels while reducing environmental impact, being economically viable, and socially responsible. Knowledge about the sustainability performance of current livestock production systems may help to formulate strategies for future systems. Our study provides a systematic overview of differences between conventional and organic livestock production systems on a broad range of sustainability aspects and animal species available in peer-reviewed literature. Systems were compared on economy, productivity, environmental impact, animal welfare and public health. The review was limited to dairy cattle, beef cattle, pigs, broilers and laying hens, and to Europe, North America and New Zealand. Results per indicators are presented as in the articles without performing additional calculations. Out of 4171 initial search hits, 179 articles were analysed. Studies varied widely in indicators, research design, sample size and location and context. Quite some studies used small samples. No study analysed all aspects of sustainability simultaneously. Conventional systems had lower labour requirements per unit product, lower income risk per animal, higher production per animal per time unit, higher reproduction numbers, lower feed conversion ratio, lower land use, generally lower acidification and eutrophication potential per unit product, equal or better udder health for cows and equal or lower microbiological contamination. Organic systems had higher income per animal or full time employee, lower impact on biodiversity, lower eutrophication and acidification potential per unit land, equal or lower likelihood of antibiotic resistance in bacteria and higher beneficial fatty acid levels in cow milk. For most sustainability aspects, sometimes conventional and sometimes organic systems performed better, except for productivity, which was consistently higher in conventional systems. For many aspects and animal species, more data are needed to conclude on a difference between organic and conventional livestock production systems.
为了可持续地促进不断增长且日益富裕的世界人口的粮食安全,畜牧生产系统面临着提高生产水平同时减少环境影响、保持经济可行性并承担社会责任的挑战。了解当前畜牧生产系统的可持续性表现可能有助于制定未来系统的策略。我们的研究系统地概述了同行评审文献中常规和有机畜牧生产系统在广泛的可持续性方面以及可用动物种类之间的差异。对系统在经济、生产力、环境影响、动物福利和公共卫生方面进行了比较。该综述仅限于奶牛、肉牛、猪、肉鸡和蛋鸡,以及欧洲、北美和新西兰。每个指标的结果按照文章中的呈现方式给出,未进行额外计算。在4171条初始搜索结果中,分析了179篇文章。各项研究在指标、研究设计、样本量以及地点和背景方面差异很大。相当多的研究使用了小样本。没有一项研究同时分析可持续性的所有方面。常规系统每单位产品的劳动力需求较低,每头动物的收入风险较低,每时间单位每头动物的产量较高,繁殖数量较多,饲料转化率较低,土地使用较少,通常每单位产品的酸化和富营养化潜力较低,奶牛的乳房健康状况相同或更好,微生物污染相同或更低。有机系统每头动物或全职员工的收入较高,对生物多样性的影响较低,每单位土地的富营养化和酸化潜力较低,细菌产生抗生素耐药性的可能性相同或更低,牛奶中的有益脂肪酸水平较高。对于大多数可持续性方面,有时常规系统表现更好,有时有机系统表现更好,但生产力方面除外,常规系统的生产力一直更高。对于许多方面和动物种类,需要更多数据才能得出有机和常规畜牧生产系统之间差异的结论。