Desai Shoma, Gruber Phillip F, Eiting Erick, Seabury Seth A, Mack Wendy J, Voyageur Christian, Vasquez Veronica, Kim Hyung T, Terp Sophie
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Nov;70(5):623-631.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.03.043. Epub 2017 May 27.
Increasingly, hospitals are using utilization review software to reduce hospital admissions in an effort to contain costs. Such practices have the potential to increase the number of unsafe discharges, particularly in public safety-net hospitals. Utilization review software tools are not well studied with regard to their effect on emergency department (ED) operations. We study the effect of prospectively used admission decision support on ED operations.
In 2012, Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center implemented prospective use of computerized admission criteria. After implementation, only ED patients meeting primary review (diagnosis-based criteria) or secondary review (medical necessity as determined by an on-site emergency physician) were assigned inpatient beds. Data were extracted from electronic medical records from September 2011 through December 2013. Outcomes included operational metrics, 30-day ED revisits, and 30-day admission rates. Excluding a 6-month implementation period, monthly summary metrics were compared pre- and postimplementation with nonparametric and negative binomial regression methods. All adult ED visits, excluding incarcerated and purely behavioral health visits, were analyzed. The primary outcomes were disposition rates. Secondary outcomes were 30-day ED revisits, 30-day admission rate among return visitors to the ED, and estimated cost.
Analysis of 245,662 ED encounters was performed. The inpatient admission rate decreased from 14.2% to 12.8%. Increases in discharge rate (82.4% to 83.4%) and ED observation unit utilization (2.5% to 3.4%) were found. Thirty-day revisits increased (20.4% to 24.4%), although the 30-day admission rate decreased (3.2% to 2.8%). Estimated cost savings totaled $193.17 per ED visit.
The prospective application of utilization review software in the ED led to a decrease in the admission rate. This was tempered by a concomitant increase in ED observation unit utilization and 30-day ED revisits. Cost savings suggest that resources should be redirected to the more highly affected ED and ED observation unit, although more work is needed to confirm the generalizability of these findings.
医院越来越多地使用利用审查软件来减少住院人数,以控制成本。这种做法有可能增加不安全出院的数量,尤其是在公共安全网医院。利用审查软件工具对急诊科(ED)运营的影响尚未得到充分研究。我们研究前瞻性使用的入院决策支持对急诊科运营的影响。
2012年,洛杉矶县+南加州大学医学中心实施了前瞻性使用计算机化入院标准。实施后,只有符合初次审查(基于诊断的标准)或二次审查(由现场急诊医生确定的医疗必要性)的急诊科患者才能分配到住院床位。数据从2011年9月至2013年12月的电子病历中提取。结果包括运营指标、30天急诊科复诊率和30天入院率。排除6个月的实施期,采用非参数和负二项回归方法比较实施前后的月度汇总指标。分析了所有成人急诊科就诊情况,不包括被监禁者和纯粹的行为健康就诊。主要结果是处置率。次要结果是30天急诊科复诊率、急诊科复诊患者的30天入院率和估计成本。
对245,662次急诊科就诊进行了分析。住院入院率从14.2%降至12.8%。出院率(从82.4%增至83.4%)和急诊科观察病房利用率(从2.5%增至3.4%)有所增加。30天复诊率有所上升(从20.4%增至24.4%),尽管30天入院率有所下降(从3.2%降至2.8%)。每次急诊科就诊估计节省成本总计193.17美元。
利用审查软件在急诊科的前瞻性应用导致入院率下降。这被急诊科观察病房利用率和30天急诊科复诊率的相应增加所缓和。成本节省表明应将资源重新导向受影响更大的急诊科和急诊科观察病房,尽管需要更多工作来证实这些发现的普遍性。