Yang Tsung-Lin, Huang Chin-Chou, Huang Shao-Sung, Chiu Chun-Chih, Leu Hsin-Bang, Lin Shing-Jong
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital.
Acta Cardiol Sin. 2017 May;33(3):241-249. doi: 10.6515/acs20160902a.
To date, it remains unsettled whether aortic arch calcification (AAC) has prognostic value in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
From January 1 to December 31, 2013, a total of 225 patients with acute coronary syndrome (mean age 72 ± 26 years, 75% male) were enrolled in this study. Patients admitted to the coronary care unit of a tertiary referral medical center under the preliminary diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome were retrospectively investigated. The primary endpoint was composite of long-term major adverse cardiovascular events. The secondary endpoints were 30-day and long-term all-cause mortality.
Of the 225 patients enrolled in this study, 143 had detectable AAC. Those who had AAC were older, with higher Killip classification and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) score with a lower probability of single vessel disease. Acute coronary syndrome patients with AAC had significantly higher 30-day mortality (17.3% vs. 7.1%, log-rank p = 0.02). During a mean follow-up period of 165 ± 140 days (maximum 492 days), the calcification group had significantly increased cardiovascular deaths (27.6% vs. 11.2%, log-rank p = 0.002), all-cause mortality (28.3% vs. 11.2%, log-rank p = 0.001) and composite endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (39.4% vs. 24.6%, log-rank p = 0.01). After adjusting for age, gender, diabetes mellitus and hypertension, AAC was an independent risk factor for primary and secondary endpoints among patients with acute coronary syndrome.
AAC provided valuable prognostic information on clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, different treatment strategies would be warranted for optimal risk reduction in such a population.
迄今为止,主动脉弓钙化(AAC)在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中是否具有预后价值仍未明确。
2013年1月1日至12月31日,本研究共纳入225例急性冠状动脉综合征患者(平均年龄72±26岁,75%为男性)。对在一家三级转诊医疗中心的冠心病监护病房初步诊断为急性冠状动脉综合征的患者进行回顾性调查。主要终点是长期主要不良心血管事件的复合终点。次要终点是30天和长期全因死亡率。
在本研究纳入的225例患者中,143例可检测到AAC。有AAC的患者年龄较大,Killip分级和心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)评分较高,单支血管病变的可能性较低。有AAC的急性冠状动脉综合征患者30天死亡率显著更高(17.3%对7.1%,对数秩检验p = 0.02)。在平均随访165±140天(最长492天)期间,钙化组心血管死亡显著增加(27.6%对11.2%,对数秩检验p = 0.002),全因死亡率(28.3%对11.2%,对数秩检验p = 0.001)以及主要不良心血管事件的复合终点(39.4%对24.6%,对数秩检验p = 0.01)。在调整年龄、性别、糖尿病和高血压后,AAC是急性冠状动脉综合征患者主要和次要终点的独立危险因素。
AAC为急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床结局提供了有价值的预后信息。然而,对于该人群,需要采用不同的治疗策略以实现最佳的风险降低。