Université Côte d'Azur, UFR Odontologie, Nice, France.
Aix-Marseille Université, ADES, Marseille, France.
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017 Nov 12;29(6):416-423. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12304. Epub 2017 May 31.
The purpose of this study was to analyze 50 smiles using 3D stereophotogrammetry (3D-spg)-based facial reconstruction, to calculate ratios involving measurements of the distances between dental and facial landmarks and to compare these ratios with the golden ratio φ (1.618).
Fifty subjects with no obvious malocclusion participated in this study. For each subject, 4 photographs were acquired using the LifeViz Mini™, an absolute calibration 3D-spg system. Facial and dental landmarks (based on Farkas' definitions) were fixed, and 8 distances were measured. Four ratios were then calculated and compared with the value of 1.618.
The ratio "incisal edge of the maxillary central incisor-lower border of the chin/subnasal point-incisal edge of the maxillary central incisor" (IE-Me/SN-IE) was 1.693 ± 0.190, the ratio "right endocanthion-left endocanthion/right exocanthion-right endocanthion" was 1.582 ± 0.173, the ratio "incisal edge of the maxillary central incisor-distal edge of the right canine/distal edge of the right canine-right labial commissure" was 1.670 ± 0.355, and the ratio "right labial commissure-left labial commissure/distal edge of the right canine-distal edge of the left canine" was 1.602 ± 0.136. In contrast, the vertical ratio IE-Me/SN-IE significantly differed from the golden ratio (1 sample t test, P = .009).
This study revealed that the observed ratios were surprisingly close to the golden ratio. Only the vertical ratio differed from the golden ratio, whereas the horizontal ratios appear to be adequately approximated by φ.
If the distances from reference points of the face to teeth within a harmonious smile exhibited recurring esthetic proportions, knowledge of such ratios would provide an additional tool for the elaboration of esthetic treatment plans. In addition, this knowledge could provide guidance when planning tooth positions and dental proportions by encouraging consideration of the global nature of the oro-facial sphere.
本研究旨在通过基于三维体层摄影术(3D-spg)的面部重建分析 50 个微笑,计算涉及牙颌面标志点之间距离测量的比值,并将这些比值与黄金比例φ(1.618)进行比较。
本研究纳入 50 名无明显错颌的受试者。每位受试者使用 LifeViz Mini™(一种绝对校准的 3D-spg 系统)拍摄 4 张照片。固定面部和牙颌面标志点(基于 Farkas 定义),测量 8 个距离。然后计算 4 个比值,并与 1.618 进行比较。
“上颌中切牙切缘-下颌下缘-鼻下点”(IE-Me/SN-IE)的比值为 1.693±0.190,“右眼内角-左眼内角/右眼外角-右眼内角”的比值为 1.582±0.173,“上颌中切牙切缘-右侧尖牙远中缘-右侧尖牙-右侧唇系带”的比值为 1.670±0.355,“右侧唇系带-左侧唇系带/右侧尖牙远中缘-左侧尖牙远中缘”的比值为 1.602±0.136。相比之下,IE-Me/SN-IE 的垂直比值明显不同于黄金比例(1 个样本 t 检验,P=0.009)。
本研究表明,观察到的比值与黄金比例非常接近。只有垂直比值与黄金比例不同,而水平比值似乎可以被φ充分近似。
如果和谐微笑中从面部参考点到牙齿的距离呈现出规律的美学比例,那么这些比例的知识将为美学治疗计划的制定提供额外的工具。此外,这种知识还可以通过鼓励考虑口颌面球体的整体性质,为牙齿位置和牙颌面比例的规划提供指导。