Suppr超能文献

经皮依托芬那酯和双氯芬酸在健康志愿者中的药代动力学。

Pharmacokinetics of Transdermal Etofenamate and Diclofenac in Healthy Volunteers.

机构信息

Division of Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.

Drossapharm Ltd., Basel/Arlesheim, Switzerland.

出版信息

Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2017 Nov;121(5):423-429. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12818. Epub 2017 Jun 27.

Abstract

Little is known about the course of the plasma concentration and the bioavailability of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) contained in dermal patches. We compared an etofenamate prototype patch (patent EP 1833471) and a commercially available diclofenac epolamine patch regarding the bioavailability of the active ingredients relative to respective i.m. applications and regarding their plasma concentration-time course. Twenty-four healthy human volunteers were treated using a parallel group design (n = 12 per group) with a single dermal patch (removed after 12 hr) followed (after a latency of 48 hr) by eight consecutive dermal patches every 12 hr to reach steady-state conditions. The patches were generally well tolerated, but one volunteer treated with etofenamate developed an allergic contact dermatitis. After the first patch, C was 0.81 ± 0.11 (mean ± S.E.M.) ng/mL (reached 12 hr after patch removal) for diclofenac and 31.3 ± 3.8 ng/mL for flufenamic acid (reached at patch removal), the main metabolite of etofenamate. Etofenamate was not detectable. After repetitive dosing, trough plasma concentrations after the eighth dose were 1.72 ± 0.32 ng/mL for diclofenac and 48.7 ± 6.6 ng/mL for flufenamic acid. Bioavailabilities (single dose) relative to i.m. applications were 0.22 ± 0.04% for diclofenac and 1.15 ± 0.06% for flufenamic acid. In conclusion, the relative bioavailability (compared to the respective i.m. application) of both drugs is low. The maximal plasma concentrations after topical administration of these drugs are well below the IC values for COX-1 and COX-2, explaining the absence of dose-dependent toxicities.

摘要

关于贴皮制剂中所含的非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)的血浆浓度和生物利用度知之甚少。我们比较了依托芬那酯原型贴剂(专利 EP 1833471)和一种市售的双氯芬酸依托胺贴剂,比较了它们的活性成分相对于各自的肌内应用的生物利用度,以及它们的血浆浓度-时间曲线。24 名健康志愿者采用平行组设计(每组 12 名)接受治疗,使用单次贴皮制剂(12 小时后去除),然后(48 小时潜伏期后)每 12 小时连续使用 8 个贴皮制剂,以达到稳态条件。贴剂通常耐受性良好,但一名接受依托芬那酯治疗的志愿者出现了过敏性接触性皮炎。第一次贴剂后,双氯芬酸的 C 为 0.81 ± 0.11(均值 ± S.E.M.)ng/mL(去除贴剂 12 小时后达到),而依托芬那酯的主要代谢物氟芬那酸为 31.3 ± 3.8 ng/mL(去除贴剂时达到)。未检测到依托芬那酯。重复给药后,第八次给药后的谷血浆浓度为双氯芬酸的 1.72 ± 0.32 ng/mL 和氟芬那酸的 48.7 ± 6.6 ng/mL。与肌内应用相比,(单次剂量)的生物利用度分别为双氯芬酸的 0.22 ± 0.04%和氟芬那酸的 1.15 ± 0.06%。总之,这两种药物的相对生物利用度(与各自的肌内应用相比)均较低。这些药物局部给药后的最大血浆浓度远低于 COX-1 和 COX-2 的 IC 值,解释了无剂量依赖性毒性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验