Stratz T
Rheumaklinik, Bad Säckingen.
Fortschr Med. 1990 Apr 30;108(13):264-6.
In a controlled multi-center single-blind study, the relative efficacy and tolerance of i.m. injectable preparations of etofenamat(e) and diclofenac sodium were investigated in 96 patients with acute lumbago. Treatment resulted in obvious improvement in function and reduction in pain, no statistical difference being found between the two drugs. In 43% of the patients treated with etofenamat(e) and 27% of those receiving diclofenac, the final medical report indicated very good therapeutic results. Under etofenamat(e) i.m. therapy, no side effects occurred, and in no case did treatment have to be discontinued. Under diclofenac, two patients experienced adverse reactions, one allergic exanthema, and the other itching and a sensation of heat. A further patient experienced no improvement after the first injection and discontinued treatment.
在一项对照多中心单盲研究中,对96例急性腰痛患者研究了依托芬那酯和双氯芬酸钠肌肉注射制剂的相对疗效和耐受性。治疗使功能明显改善且疼痛减轻,两种药物之间未发现统计学差异。在接受依托芬那酯治疗的患者中,43%的患者以及接受双氯芬酸治疗的患者中27%的患者,最终医疗报告显示治疗效果非常好。在依托芬那酯肌肉注射治疗下,未出现副作用,且在任何情况下治疗均无需中断。在双氯芬酸治疗下,两名患者出现不良反应,一名出现过敏性皮疹,另一名出现瘙痒和热感。另有一名患者在首次注射后无改善并停止治疗。