Suppr超能文献

一项基于登记的研究:2001年至2013年在瑞典进行的结肠镜检查中的不良事件。

A register-based study: adverse events in colonoscopies performed in Sweden 2001-2013.

作者信息

Forsberg Anna, Hammar Ulf, Ekbom Anders, Hultcrantz Rolf

机构信息

a Department of Medicine Solna , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.

b Department of Biostatistics , Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep;52(9):1042-1047. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1334812. Epub 2017 May 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The rates for colonoscopy-associated adverse events vary considerably worldwide. In Sweden, the figures are known to a limited extent. We assessed the frequency of severe colonoscopy-related adverse events and the impacts of different risk factors, including the use of general anaesthesia.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective population-based cohort study of the colonoscopies performed during the years 2001-2013 on adults identified in the Swedish health registers. The rates for bleeding, perforation, splenic injury and 30-day mortality were calculated. Covariates for risks were assessed in a multivariate Poisson regression model.

RESULTS

There were 593,315 colonoscopies performed on the 426,560 individuals included in the study. The rates for colonoscopy-related bleeding and perforation were 0.17% and 0.11%, respectively. When polypectomy was performed, the rates were 0.53% for bleeding and 0.25% for perforation. There were 31 splenic injuries (1:20,000 colonoscopies) reported. The crude 30-day death rate for colonoscopy was 0.68%. Of those diagnosed with bleeding or perforation, 5.6% and 6.1% were dead within 30 days, respectively. The multivariate RR for perforation when general anaesthesia was employed was 2.65 (p < .001; 95%CI 1.71-4.12).

CONCLUSIONS

The perforation rate seemed to be relatively high in an international perspective. General anaesthesia was associated with a significantly higher risk for perforation. Splenic injuries were more frequent than expected.

摘要

目的

结肠镜检查相关不良事件的发生率在全球范围内差异很大。在瑞典,相关数据了解有限。我们评估了严重结肠镜检查相关不良事件的发生率以及不同风险因素的影响,包括全身麻醉的使用情况。

材料与方法

这是一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2001年至2013年期间在瑞典健康登记册中确定的接受结肠镜检查的成年人。计算出血、穿孔、脾损伤和30天死亡率。在多变量泊松回归模型中评估风险的协变量。

结果

纳入研究的426,560名个体共进行了593,315次结肠镜检查。结肠镜检查相关出血和穿孔的发生率分别为0.17%和0.11%。进行息肉切除时,出血发生率为0.53%,穿孔发生率为0.25%。报告了31例脾损伤(每20,000次结肠镜检查中有1例)。结肠镜检查的粗30天死亡率为0.68%。在诊断为出血或穿孔的患者中,30天内死亡的比例分别为5.6%和6.1%。采用全身麻醉时穿孔的多变量相对危险度为2.65(p < 0.001;95%置信区间1.71 - 4.12)。

结论

从国际角度看,穿孔率似乎相对较高。全身麻醉与穿孔风险显著升高相关。脾损伤比预期更频繁。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验