Suppr超能文献

改善临终关怀:在专门从事靶向和免疫治疗的肿瘤诊所中嵌入姑息治疗。

Improving End-of-Life Care: Palliative Care Embedded in an Oncology Clinic Specializing in Targeted and Immune-Based Therapies.

机构信息

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Boston College; and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

出版信息

J Oncol Pract. 2017 Sep;13(9):e729-e737. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2016.020396. Epub 2017 May 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Patients with advanced cancer benefit from early involvement of palliative care. The ideal method of palliative care integration remains to be determined, as does its effectiveness for patients treated with targeted and immune-based therapies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We studied the impact of an embedded palliative care team that saw patients in an academic oncology clinic specializing in targeted and immune-based therapies. Patients seen on a specific day accessed the embedded model, on the basis of automatic criteria; patients seen other days could be referred to a separate palliative care clinic (usual care). We abstracted data from the medical records of 114 patients who died during the 3 years after this model's implementation.

RESULTS

Compared with usual care (n = 88), patients with access to the embedded model (n = 26) encountered palliative care as outpatients more often ( P = .003) and earlier (mean, 231 v 109 days before death; P < .001). Hospice enrollment rates were similar ( P = .303), but duration was doubled (mean, 57 v 25 days; P = .006), and enrollment > 7 days before death-a core Quality Oncology Practice Initiative metric-was higher in the embedded model (odds ratio, 5.60; P = .034). Place of death ( P = .505) and end-of-life chemotherapy (odds ratio, 0.361; P = .204) did not differ between the two arms.

CONCLUSION

A model of embedded and automatically triggered palliative care among patients treated exclusively with targeted and immune-based therapies was associated with significant improvements in use and timing of palliative care and hospice, compared with usual practice.

摘要

目的

晚期癌症患者受益于早期姑息治疗。姑息治疗整合的理想方法仍有待确定,其对接受靶向和免疫治疗的患者的疗效也是如此。

材料和方法

我们研究了在专门从事靶向和免疫治疗的学术肿瘤诊所中为患者提供服务的嵌入式姑息治疗团队的影响。根据自动标准,在特定日子就诊的患者可以使用嵌入式模型;其他日子就诊的患者可以转介到单独的姑息治疗诊所(常规护理)。我们从该模型实施后 3 年内死亡的 114 名患者的病历中提取数据。

结果

与常规护理(n = 88)相比,有机会接受嵌入式模型(n = 26)的患者门诊接受姑息治疗的频率更高(P =.003),时间更早(平均 231 天 vs 109 天;P <.001)。临终关怀登记率相似(P =.303),但持续时间增加了一倍(平均 57 天 vs 25 天;P =.006),且在嵌入式模型中,死亡前 7 天以上的登记率更高(优势比,5.60;P =.034),这是一个核心的肿瘤质量实践倡议指标。死亡地点(P =.505)和临终前化疗(优势比,0.361;P =.204)在两个组之间没有差异。

结论

在专门接受靶向和免疫治疗的患者中,一种嵌入式和自动触发的姑息治疗模式与姑息治疗和临终关怀的使用和时机的显著改善相关,与常规实践相比。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验