Department of Supportive and Palliative Care, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Biostatistics Unit, DRCI, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Apr 17;20(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00754-x.
Team-based and timely integrated palliative care is a gold standard of care in oncology, but issues concerning its optimal organization remain. Palliative Care in Day-Hospital (PCDH) could be one of the most efficient service model of palliative care to deliver interdisciplinary and multidimensional care addressing the complex supportive care needs of patients with advanced cancer. We hypothesize that, compared to conventional outpatient palliative care, PCDH allows the clinical benefits of palliative care to be enhanced.
METHODS/DESIGN: This study is a multicentre parallel group trial with stratified randomization. Patient management in PCDH will be compared to conventional outpatient palliative care. The inclusion criteria are advanced cancer patients referred to a palliative care team with an estimated life expectancy of more than 2 months and less than 1 year. The primary endpoint is health-related quality of life with deterioration-free survival based on the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. The secondary objectives are the following: increase in patient satisfaction with care using the EORTC PATSAT-C33 and OUT-PATSAT7 questionnaires, better understanding of the prognosis using the PTPQ questionnaire and advance care planning; decrease in the need for supportive care among relatives using the SCNS-P&C-F questionnaire, and reduction in end-of-life care aggressiveness. Patients will complete one to five questionnaires on a tablet before each monthly visit over 6 months and will be followed for 1 year. A qualitative study will take place, aiming to understand the specificity of palliative care management in PCDH. Cost-effectiveness, cost-utility and, an additional economic evaluation based on capability approach will be conducted from a societal point of view.
The first strength of this study is that it combines the main relevant outcomes assessing integrated palliative care; patient quality of life and satisfaction; discussion of the prognosis and advance care planning, family well-being and end-of-life care aggressiveness. The second strength of the study is that it is a mixed-method study associating a qualitative analysis of the specificity of PCDH organization, with a medical-economic study to analyse the cost of care.
Name of the registry: IDRCB 2019-A03116-51 Trial registration number: NCT04604873 Date of registration: October 27, 2020 URL of trial registry record.
团队式及时综合姑息治疗是肿瘤学护理的黄金标准,但关于其最佳组织形式的问题仍然存在。姑息治疗日间病房(PCDH)可能是提供跨学科和多维度护理的最有效的姑息治疗服务模式之一,可满足晚期癌症患者复杂的支持性护理需求。我们假设,与传统的门诊姑息治疗相比,PCDH 可以增强姑息治疗的临床效益。
方法/设计:这是一项多中心平行组试验,采用分层随机化。将姑息治疗日间病房的患者管理与传统的门诊姑息治疗进行比较。纳入标准为预计生存期超过 2 个月且不足 1 年的姑息治疗团队转诊的晚期癌症患者。主要终点是根据 EORTC QLQ-C30 问卷评估的无恶化生存的健康相关生活质量。次要目标如下:使用 EORTC PATSAT-C33 和 OUT-PATSAT7 问卷提高患者对护理的满意度,使用 PTPQ 问卷更好地了解预后,进行预先护理计划;使用 SCNS-P&C-F 问卷减少亲属对支持性护理的需求,以及降低临终关怀的攻击性。患者将在 6 个月的每个月就诊前在平板电脑上完成一到五个问卷,并在 1 年内进行随访。将进行定性研究,旨在了解 PCDH 姑息治疗管理的特殊性。将从社会角度进行成本效益、成本效用以及基于能力方法的额外经济评估。
该研究的第一个优势在于它结合了评估综合姑息治疗的主要相关结局,包括患者的生活质量和满意度;预后讨论和预先护理计划;家庭幸福感和临终关怀的攻击性。研究的第二个优势是它是一项混合方法研究,将 PCDH 组织特殊性的定性分析与医疗经济研究相结合,分析护理成本。
注册名称:IDRCB 2019-A03116-51 试验注册号:NCT04604873 注册日期:2020 年 10 月 27 日 试验注册表记录的 URL。