Tickler David M, Letessier Tom B, Koldewey Heather J, Meeuwig Jessica J
Oceans Institute: Centre for Marine Futures, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Perth, WA, Australia.
Zoological Society of London, Regents Park, London, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2017 May 31;12(5):e0177374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177374. eCollection 2017.
We investigated drivers of reef shark demography across a large and isolated marine protected area, the British Indian Ocean Territory Marine Reserve, using stereo baited remote underwater video systems. We modelled shark abundance against biotic and abiotic variables at 35 sites across the reserve and found that the biomass of low trophic order fish (specifically planktivores) had the greatest effect on shark abundance, although models also included habitat variables (depth, coral cover and site type). There was significant variation in the composition of the shark assemblage at different atolls within the reserve. In particular, the deepest habitat sampled (a seamount at 70-80m visited for the first time in this study) recorded large numbers of scalloped hammerhead sharks (Sphyrna lewini) not observed elsewhere. Size structure of the most abundant and common species, grey reef sharks (Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos), varied with location. Individuals at an isolated bank were 30% smaller than those at the main atolls, with size structure significantly biased towards the size range for young of year (YOY). The 18 individuals judged to be YOY represented the offspring of between four and six females, so, whilst inconclusive, these data suggest the possible use of a common pupping site by grey reef sharks. The importance of low trophic order fish biomass (i.e. potential prey) in predicting spatial variation in shark abundance is consistent with other studies both in marine and terrestrial systems which suggest that prey availability may be a more important predictor of predator distribution than habitat suitability. This result supports the need for ecosystem level rather than species-specific conservation measures to support shark recovery. The observed spatial partitioning amongst sites for species and life-stages also implies the need to include a diversity of habitats and reef types within a protected area for adequate protection of reef-associated shark assemblages.
我们利用立体诱饵远程水下视频系统,对一个大型且孤立的海洋保护区——英属印度洋领地海洋保护区内礁鲨种群统计学的驱动因素进行了调查。我们针对保护区内35个地点的生物和非生物变量,建立了鲨鱼丰度模型,发现低营养级鱼类(特别是浮游生物食性鱼类)的生物量对鲨鱼丰度的影响最大,尽管模型中也纳入了栖息地变量(深度、珊瑚覆盖率和地点类型)。保护区内不同环礁的鲨鱼群落组成存在显著差异。特别是,本研究首次探访的最深栖息地(一座位于70 - 80米深处的海山)记录到大量在其他地方未观察到的扇形锤头鲨(路氏双髻鲨)。最丰富且常见的物种——灰礁鲨(灰色真鲨)的体型结构随地点而异。一个孤立浅滩处的个体比主要环礁处的个体小30%,体型结构明显偏向当年幼鱼(YOY)的大小范围。被判定为当年幼鱼的18个个体代表了四至六只雌性鲨鱼的后代,所以,尽管尚无定论,但这些数据表明灰礁鲨可能会使用一个共同的繁殖地。低营养级鱼类生物量(即潜在猎物)在预测鲨鱼丰度的空间变化方面的重要性,与海洋和陆地系统中的其他研究一致,这些研究表明猎物可获得性可能比栖息地适宜性更能预测捕食者的分布。这一结果支持了需要采取生态系统层面而非物种特定的保护措施来促进鲨鱼种群恢复。在不同地点观察到的物种和生活阶段的空间划分,也意味着在保护区内需要纳入多种栖息地和礁体类型,以充分保护与礁体相关的鲨鱼群落。