Young R C
Cancer Chemother Biol Response Modif. 1987;9:303-37.
Several general conclusions are beginning to emerge from the series of prospective trials in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Combination chemotherapy continues to demonstrate higher overall response rates and higher complete remission rates than single alkylating agents, although in some studies survival is not significantly different. Nevertheless, long-term disease-free survivals, although uncommon, are more frequent with combinations, particularly when the dose intensity of the combination is adequate. Although CAP is the most commonly used combination, evidence continues to suggest that cyclophosphamide/cisplatin alone may be equivalent. Several studies have incorporated alkylating agent maintenance into their clinical trials and each reports acute leukemic complications. In light of the absence of a major contribution for this approach, alkylating agent maintenance in ovarian cancer should not be encouraged. Several studies this year emphasize the discouraging results associated with the use of total abdominal radiation therapy post-induction chemotherapy even with patients with minimal or no residual disease. In light of the publications this year and of previously published studies, this approach, although based on sound rationale, appears to be of limited benefit. Salvage chemotherapy, in general, has been unsatisfactory. The 2 interesting reports this year were the activity of low-dose mitomycin C and the potential utility of VP-16/cisplatin combinations in a salvage setting. In cervix carcinoma, trials have documented significant activity for the new drugs, carboplatin (28% response) and ifosfamide (30%), but each has significant side effects. Whether these will prove more active than cisplatin or whether they may be used in combination is unresolved. The continued investigation into the use of radiation sensitizers in cervical carcinoma is of interest and several studies using weekly low-dose cisplatin have established the feasibility of this approach, although long-term survival benefits have not yet been documented. In endometrial carcinoma, epidemiologic studies continue to define the role of postmenopausal estrogens in endometrial carcinoma risk. This year a Swedish study documents a smaller overall risk from estrogen treatment, perhaps related to a substantially lower use of conjugated estrogens in that country. Combination chemotherapy continues to show some activity, although the contribution of combinations in excess of the single agent activity of doxorubicin is still poorly documented. One study does demonstrate significant activity for the commonly used CAP regimen with an overall response rate of 56% and 28% complete remissions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
在卵巢癌治疗的一系列前瞻性试验中,一些总体结论开始显现。联合化疗继续显示出比单一烷化剂更高的总体缓解率和更高的完全缓解率,尽管在一些研究中生存率并无显著差异。然而,长期无病生存虽不常见,但联合化疗更为频繁,尤其是当联合化疗的剂量强度足够时。尽管CAP是最常用的联合方案,但有证据继续表明,仅环磷酰胺/顺铂可能效果相当。几项研究已将烷化剂维持治疗纳入其临床试验,且每项研究均报告了急性白血病并发症。鉴于这种方法并无重大作用,不应鼓励在卵巢癌中使用烷化剂维持治疗。今年的几项研究强调了诱导化疗后使用全腹放疗的令人沮丧的结果,即使是对残留病灶极少或无残留病灶的患者也是如此。鉴于今年的出版物以及先前发表的研究,这种方法尽管有合理的理论依据,但似乎益处有限。一般来说,挽救性化疗并不令人满意。今年有两篇有趣的报告,分别是低剂量丝裂霉素C的活性以及VP - 16/顺铂联合方案在挽救治疗中的潜在效用。在宫颈癌方面,试验已证明新药卡铂(缓解率28%)和异环磷酰胺(缓解率30%)有显著活性,但每种药物都有显著副作用。它们是否比顺铂更具活性,或者是否可联合使用,尚无定论。对宫颈癌中放射增敏剂使用的持续研究很有意义,几项使用每周低剂量顺铂的研究已证实了这种方法的可行性,尽管尚未证明其对长期生存有益。在子宫内膜癌方面,流行病学研究继续明确绝经后雌激素在子宫内膜癌风险中的作用。今年一项瑞典研究表明,雌激素治疗的总体风险较小,这可能与该国共轭雌激素的使用量大幅降低有关。联合化疗继续显示出一定活性,尽管联合化疗超过阿霉素单药活性的作用仍缺乏充分记录。一项研究确实证明常用的CAP方案有显著活性,总体缓解率为56%,完全缓解率为28%。(摘要截取自400字)