Goodnight Charles J
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60680.
Evolution. 1987 Jan;41(1):80-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb05772.x.
Mayr (1963) proposed that small isolated propagules from a large panmictic population would occasionally undergo a genetic revolution due to loss of genetic variability. More recently Templeton (1980a) has suggested that founder events may be much more important in systems that have strong epistasis. Because of the work of these and other authors it becomes an interesting theoretical problem to study the distribution of epistatic variance in a population following a founder event. In the model presented here measures of coancestry (Cockerham, 1967, 1984; Cockerham and Weir, 1973; Weir and Cockerham, 1973, 1977; Tachida and Cockerham, unpubl.) are used to examine the effect of founder events on additive-by-additive epistasis. Using this approach, the coancestries, or intraclass correlations, within individuals and within demes, together with the genetic variance components in the ancestral population are used to obtain the variance within and among demes following a founder event. Examples are analyzed for single founder events of 1-25 individuals and multiple founder events of two individuals. Following a single founder event, the contribution of the additive variance to the variance within demes relative to the additive variance in the ancestral population is always less than one. However, the contribution of epistatic variance to the variance within demes relative to the epistatic variance in the ancestral population is always greater than one. Thus, while a founder event decreases the contribution of additive variance to the variance within demes, it increases the contribution of epistatic variance to the variance within demes. The contribution of epistatic variance to the variance among demes following a single founder event is not qualitatively different from the contribution of additive variance to the variance among demes. These results indicate that epistatic variance is less likely than additive variance to cause a genetic revolution following a single founder event. When populations undergo multiple founder events the situation changes considerably. Epistatic variance may contribute as much as four times its original value to the variance among demes, while additive variance can contribute maximally twice its original value to the variance among demes. Thus, epistasis, which is relatively unimportant following a single founder event, may have major evolutionary implications if drift is allowed to continue for several generations.
迈尔(1963年)提出,来自一个大的随机交配群体的小的隔离繁殖体偶尔会因遗传变异性的丧失而经历一次遗传革命。最近,坦普尔顿(1980a)指出,奠基者事件在具有强上位性的系统中可能更为重要。由于这些作者以及其他作者的工作,研究奠基者事件后群体中上位性方差的分布成为一个有趣的理论问题。在本文提出的模型中,共同祖先系数(科克伦,1967年、1984年;科克伦和韦尔,1973年;韦尔和科克伦,1973年、1977年;立田和科克伦,未发表)被用于研究奠基者事件对加性×加性上位性的影响。采用这种方法,个体内部和群体内部的共同祖先系数或组内相关,连同祖先群体中的遗传方差成分,被用于获得奠基者事件后群体内部和群体之间的方差。对1至25个个体的单奠基者事件以及两个个体的多奠基者事件的例子进行了分析。在单奠基者事件之后,相对于祖先群体中的加性方差,加性方差对群体内部方差的贡献总是小于1。然而,相对于祖先群体中的上位性方差,上位性方差对群体内部方差的贡献总是大于1。因此,虽然奠基者事件减少了加性方差对群体内部方差的贡献,但它增加了上位性方差对群体内部方差的贡献。单奠基者事件后上位性方差对群体间方差的贡献与加性方差对群体间方差的贡献在性质上没有差异。这些结果表明,在单奠基者事件之后,上位性方差比加性方差更不可能引发遗传革命。当群体经历多奠基者事件时,情况会发生很大变化。上位性方差对群体间方差的贡献可能高达其原始值的四倍,而加性方差对群体间方差的最大贡献可能为其原始值的两倍。因此,在单奠基者事件之后相对不重要的上位性,如果允许漂变持续几代,可能会产生重大的进化影响。