Matsuda Hiroyuki, Abrams Peter A
Department of Ecology, University of Minnesota, 1987 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55108.
Evolution. 1994 Dec;48(6):1764-1772. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1994.tb02212.x.
We analyze a popular model of the evolution of traits related to performance in exploitative competition. This model has previously been used to explain a mechanism by which interspecific competition can cause taxon cycles. We show that purely intraspecific competition can cause evolution of extreme competitive abilities that ultimately result in extinction, without any influence from other species. The only change in the model required for this outcome is the assumption of a nonnormal distribution of resources of different sizes measured on a logarithmic scale. This suggests that taxon cycles, if they exist, may be driven by within- rather than between-species competition. Self-extinction does not occur when the advantage conferred by a large value of the competitive trait (e.g., size) is relatively small, or when the carrying capacity decreases at a comparatively rapid rate with increases in trait value. The evidence regarding these assumptions is discussed. The results suggest a need for more data on resource distributions and size-advantage in order to understand the evolution of competitive traits such as body size.
我们分析了一个关于与剥削性竞争中的表现相关的性状进化的流行模型。该模型此前已被用于解释种间竞争导致分类群循环的一种机制。我们表明,纯粹的种内竞争能够导致极端竞争能力的进化,最终导致灭绝,而不受其他物种的任何影响。为实现这一结果,模型中唯一的变化是假设在对数尺度上测量的不同大小资源的分布呈非正态分布。这表明分类群循环(如果存在的话)可能是由种内竞争而非种间竞争驱动的。当竞争性状(如大小)的较大值所带来的优势相对较小时,或者当承载能力随着性状值的增加而以相对较快的速度下降时,自我灭绝不会发生。我们讨论了关于这些假设的证据。结果表明,为了理解诸如体型等竞争性状的进化,需要更多关于资源分布和大小优势的数据。