Suppr超能文献

视角:现代生活的节奏:衡量当代微观进化的速率

PERSPECTIVE: THE PACE OF MODERN LIFE: MEASURING RATES OF CONTEMPORARY MICROEVOLUTION.

作者信息

Hendry Andrew P, Kinnison Michael T

机构信息

Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada.

Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Gilman Hall, Hanover, New Hampshire, 03755.

出版信息

Evolution. 1999 Dec;53(6):1637-1653. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb04550.x.

Abstract

We evaluate methods for measuring and specifying rates of microevolution in the wild, with particular regard to studies of contemporary, often deemed "rapid," evolution. A considerable amount of ambiguity and inconsistency persists within the field, and we provide a number of suggestions that should improve study design, inference, and clarity of presentation. (1) Some studies measure change over time within a population (allochronic) and others measure the difference between two populations that had a common ancestor in the past (synchronic). Allochronic studies can be used to estimate rates of "evolution," whereas synchronic studies more appropriately estimate rates of "divergence." Rates of divergence may range from a small fraction to many times the actual evolutionary rates in the component populations. (2) Some studies measure change using individuals captured from the wild, whereas others measure differences after rearing in a common environment. The first type of study can be used to specify "phenotypic" rates and the later "genetic" rates. (3) The most commonly used evolutionary rate metric, the darwin, has a number of theoretical shortcomings. Studies of microevolution would benefit from specifying rates in standard deviations per generation, the haldane. (4) Evolutionary rates are typically specified without an indication of their precision. Readily available methods for specifying confidence intervals and statistical significance (regression, bootstrapping, randomization) should be implemented. (5) Microevolutionists should strive to accumulate time series, which can reveal temporal shifts in the rate of evolution and can be used to identify evolutionary patterns. (6) Evolutionary rates provide a convenient way to compare the tempo of evolution across studies, traits, taxa, and time scales, but such comparisons are subject to varying degrees of confidence. Comparisons across different time scales are particularly tenuous. (7) A number of multivariate rate measures exist, but considerable theoretical development is required before their utility can be determined. We encourage the continued investigation of evolutionary rates because the information they provide is relevant to a wide range of theoretical and practical issues.

摘要

我们评估了在自然环境中测量和明确微进化速率的方法,尤其关注当代常被视为“快速”进化的研究。该领域仍存在大量的模糊性和不一致性,我们提出了一些建议,这些建议应能改进研究设计、推理以及表述的清晰度。(1)一些研究测量种群内部随时间的变化(异时性),而另一些研究测量过去有共同祖先的两个种群之间的差异(同时性)。异时性研究可用于估计“进化”速率,而同时性研究更适合估计“分化”速率。分化速率可能从组成种群实际进化速率的一小部分到许多倍不等。(2)一些研究使用从野外捕获的个体来测量变化,而另一些研究则测量在共同环境中饲养后的差异。前一种类型的研究可用于明确“表型”速率,后一种用于明确“遗传”速率。(3)最常用的进化速率指标“达尔文”有一些理论缺陷。微进化研究采用每代标准差来明确速率(霍尔丹)会更有益。(4)通常在未表明进化速率精度的情况下指定进化速率。应采用现成的确定置信区间和统计显著性的方法(回归、自抽样法、随机化)。(5)微进化研究者应努力积累时间序列,这可以揭示进化速率的时间变化,并可用于识别进化模式。(6)进化速率为比较不同研究、性状、分类群和时间尺度上的进化节奏提供了一种便捷方式,但此类比较的置信度各不相同。跨不同时间尺度的比较尤其不可靠。(7)存在一些多变量速率测量方法,但在确定其效用之前还需要大量的理论发展。我们鼓励继续研究进化速率,因为它们提供的信息与广泛的理论和实际问题相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验