Schmitt Y
Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Fed. Rep. of Germany.
J Trace Elem Electrolytes Health Dis. 1987 Dec;1(2):107-14.
In the analysis of the concentration of trace elements in biological material there are many possible preanalytical sources of error. Precision and accuracy of trace element analyses are not so much determined by the analytical procedure--atomic absorption spectrometry--as by individual biological factors, contamination and loss of elements during sampling and sample preparation, influences resulting from the calibration procedure, or from the analytical equipment itself. Genetical factors like sex or race, ecological factors like age or pregnancy and short term factors like food intake, parenteral feeding or drug therapy can influence the final results. Different blood sampling methods with different duration and strength of compression may lead to hemolysis resulting in falsely elevated values of trace elements. Needles, syringes and tubes contribute to contamination by leaching trace elements from their walls or lead to loss of material by adsorption to the surface of the walls. As there is still no primary standard in order to guarantee precision and accuracy the calibration procedures have to be compared individually depending on the different matrices of the sample.
在生物材料中微量元素浓度的分析中,存在许多可能的分析前误差来源。微量元素分析的精密度和准确度与其说是由分析程序——原子吸收光谱法——决定的,不如说是由个体生物学因素、采样和样品制备过程中元素的污染和损失、校准程序或分析设备本身产生的影响所决定的。性别或种族等遗传因素、年龄或怀孕等生态因素以及食物摄入、肠外营养或药物治疗等短期因素都可能影响最终结果。不同的采血方法,压缩时间和力度不同,可能导致溶血,从而使微量元素值假性升高。针头、注射器和试管会因从其壁上浸出微量元素而造成污染,或因吸附到管壁表面而导致材料损失。由于目前仍没有主要标准来保证精密度和准确度,校准程序必须根据样品的不同基质分别进行比较。