• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无导线起搏器在日本患者与世界其他地区患者中的表现 - 来自全球临床试验的结果。

Performance of Leadless Pacemaker in Japanese Patients vs. Rest of the World - Results From a Global Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Kyorin University Hospital.

Department of Cardiology, Showa University Hospital.

出版信息

Circ J. 2017 Oct 25;81(11):1589-1595. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0259. Epub 2017 May 30.

DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0259
PMID:28566657
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A global study designed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of a transcatheter pacing system included 38 Japanese patients enrolled at 4 sites. Subgroup analysis to evaluate the performance of the leadless intracardiac transcatheter pacing system in Japanese patients was performed.Methods and Results:Safety and efficacy outcomes, patient and implant procedure characteristics, and patient and physician acceptability from the Japanese population were compared with those from outside Japan. Differences in patient characteristics, implant procedure characteristics and patient acceptability were observed. There were no major complications in Japanese patients and pacing thresholds remained low and stable throughout follow-up. There were no observable differences between Japanese patients and patients from outside Japan in the freedom from major complication rate at 12-months post-implant (100.0% vs. 95.7%, P=0.211) or physician acceptability.

CONCLUSIONS

Although some differences in specific baseline characteristics, such as body size and pacing indication, and in implant procedure characteristics, including anticoagulation strategy and hospitalization period, were observed in the Japanese patients, transcatheter pacemaker performance was similar to that in the global trial. (Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02004873.).

摘要

背景

一项旨在证明经导管起搏系统安全性和有效性的全球性研究纳入了 4 个地点的 38 名日本患者。对该无导线经导管心内起搏系统在日本患者中的表现进行了亚组分析。

方法和结果

对来自日本的患者的安全性和疗效结果、患者和植入程序特征以及患者和医生的可接受性与来自日本以外的患者进行了比较。观察到患者特征、植入程序特征和患者可接受性存在差异。在日本患者中没有发生重大并发症,起搏阈值在整个随访过程中保持较低且稳定。在植入后 12 个月时,主要并发症发生率的无重大并发症率(100.0%比 95.7%,P=0.211)或医生可接受性方面,日本患者与日本以外的患者之间没有观察到差异。

结论

尽管在日本患者中观察到一些特定的基线特征(如体型和起搏适应证)和植入程序特征(包括抗凝策略和住院时间)存在差异,但经导管起搏器的性能与全球试验相似。(临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02004873.)。

相似文献

1
Performance of Leadless Pacemaker in Japanese Patients vs. Rest of the World - Results From a Global Clinical Trial.无导线起搏器在日本患者与世界其他地区患者中的表现 - 来自全球临床试验的结果。
Circ J. 2017 Oct 25;81(11):1589-1595. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0259. Epub 2017 May 30.
2
Long-term performance of a transcatheter pacing system: 12-Month results from the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study.经导管起搏系统的长期性能:来自Micra经导管起搏研究的12个月结果。
Heart Rhythm. 2017 May;14(5):702-709. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.01.035. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
3
[Initial implantation experience and short-term follow-up results of implanting leadless intracardiac transcatheter pacing system].[无导线心腔内导管起搏系统植入的初始经验及短期随访结果]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2020 Oct 24;48(10):866-870. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20200305-00160.
4
A Leadless Intracardiac Transcatheter Pacing System.无导线心脏内介入起搏系统。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 11;374(6):533-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511643. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
5
Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in Hemodialysis Patients: Experience With the Micra Transcatheter Pacemaker.无导线起搏器在血液透析患者中的植入:Micra 经导管起搏器的经验。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Feb;5(2):162-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.12.008. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
6
The rationale and design of the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study: safety and efficacy of a novel miniaturized pacemaker.Micra经导管起搏研究的基本原理与设计:新型小型化起搏器的安全性与有效性
Europace. 2015 May;17(5):807-13. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv026. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
7
Early performance of a miniaturized leadless cardiac pacemaker: the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study.小型无导线心脏起搏器的早期性能:Micra经导管起搏研究。
Eur Heart J. 2015 Oct 1;36(37):2510-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv214. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
8
Long-term outcomes in leadless Micra transcatheter pacemakers with elevated thresholds at implantation: Results from the Micra Transcatheter Pacing System Global Clinical Trial.植入时阈值升高的无导线Micra经导管起搏器的长期预后:Micra经导管起搏系统全球临床试验结果
Heart Rhythm. 2017 May;14(5):685-691. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.01.026. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
9
Leadless pacing using the transcatheter pacing system (Micra TPS) in the real world: initial Swiss experience from the Romandie region.经导管起搏系统(Micra TPS)在真实世界中的无导线起搏应用:瑞士罗曼德地区的初步经验。
Europace. 2019 Feb 1;21(2):275-280. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy195.
10
Permanent leadless cardiac pacing: results of the LEADLESS trial.无导线心脏起搏的永久性:LEADLESS 试验结果。
Circulation. 2014 Apr 8;129(14):1466-71. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006987. Epub 2014 Mar 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Opening the door to a new era: A dual-chamber leadless pacemaker.开启新时代之门:双腔无导线起搏器。
J Arrhythm. 2025 May 28;41(3):e70100. doi: 10.1002/joa3.70100. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Snare technique is useful for leadless pacemaker implantation in a patient with severe right atrial dilatation.圈套技术对于严重右心房扩张患者的无导线起搏器植入是有用的。
J Arrhythm. 2025 Apr 23;41(2):e70075. doi: 10.1002/joa3.70075. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Analysis of the Chagas disease situation in Japan: a cross sectional study and cost-effectiveness analysis of a Chagas disease screening program.
日本恰加斯病情况分析:恰加斯病筛查项目的横断面研究及成本效益分析
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022 Sep 5;31:100574. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100574. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
The angle of the tines before the pull and hold test predicts engagement of the tines in Micra leadless pacemaker implantation.在牵拉和保持测试前叉尖的角度可预测Micra无导线起搏器植入时叉尖的置入情况。
J Arrhythm. 2022 Nov 23;39(1):10-17. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12797. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Fluoroscopic predictors of acceptable capture threshold during the implantation of the micra transcatheter pacing system.在植入 Micra 经导管起搏系统期间,透视预测可接受的捕获阈值。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022 Jun;33(6):1255-1261. doi: 10.1111/jce.15457. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
6
JCS/JHRS 2021 guideline focused update on non-pharmacotherapy of cardiac arrhythmias.《日本循环学会/日本心律学会2021年心律失常非药物治疗指南重点更新》
J Arrhythm. 2022 Jan 7;38(1):1-30. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12649. eCollection 2022 Feb.
7
Difficulty removing a leadless pacemaker in a post-transfusion patient.在输血后患者中难以取出无导线起搏器。
BMJ Case Rep. 2021 Oct 27;14(10):e246625. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2021-246625.
8
JCS/JHRS 2019 guideline on non-pharmacotherapy of cardiac arrhythmias.《日本循环学会/日本心律学会2019年心律失常非药物治疗指南》
J Arrhythm. 2021 Jun 2;37(4):709-870. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12491. eCollection 2021 Aug.
9
Tips and Tricks for Safe Retrieval of Tine-based Leadless Pacemakers.基于Tine的无导线起搏器安全取出的技巧与窍门。
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2021 Jun 15;12(6):4562-4568. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2021.120606. eCollection 2021 Jun.
10
Leadless pacemaker placement in an 18-kilogram child: Procedural approach and technical considerations.为一名18公斤重儿童植入无导线起搏器:手术方法及技术要点
HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2019 Aug 28;5(11):555-558. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2019.08.011. eCollection 2019 Nov.