Suppr超能文献

首发非情感性精神病 493 例急性静坐不能的发生率和危险因素:6 周抗精神病药物随机治疗研究。

Incidence and risk factors of acute akathisia in 493 individuals with first episode non-affective psychosis: a 6-week randomised study of antipsychotic treatment.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, IDIVAL, School of Medicine, University of Cantabria, Avda. Vadelcilla s/n, 39008, Santander, Spain.

Department of Psychiatry, Alcalá de Henares University Hospital, Coslada, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2017 Sep;234(17):2563-2570. doi: 10.1007/s00213-017-4646-1. Epub 2017 May 31.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Acute akathisia is a neuropsychiatric syndrome with a negative effect on illness outcome. Its incidence in patients treated with antipsychotics has shown to be highly variable across studies.

OBJECTIVES

Our goals were to investigate prevalence, risk factors for the development of acute akathisia, and differences in incidence between antipsychotics in a sample of 493 first episode non-affective psychosis patients.

METHODS

This is a pooled analysis of three prospective, randomized, flexible-dose, and open-label clinical trials. Patients were randomized assigned to different arms of treatment (haloperidol, quetiapine, olanzapine, ziprasidone, risperidone, or aripiprazole). Akathisia was determined using the Barnes Akathisia Scale at 6 weeks after antipsychotic initialization. Univariate analyses were performed to identify demographic, biochemical, substance use, clinical, and treatment-related predictors of acute akathisia. Considering these results, a predictive model based of a subsample of 132 patients was constructed with akathisia as the dependent variable.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of akathisia was 19.5%. No differences in demographic, biochemical, substance use, and clinical variables were found. Significant incidence differences between antipsychotics were observed (Χ  = 68.21, p = 0.000): haloperidol (57%), risperidone (20%), aripiprazole (18.2%), ziprasidone (17.2%), olanzapine (3.6%), and quetiapine (3.5%). The predictive model showed that the type of antipsychotic (OR = 21.3, p = 0.000), need for hospitalization (OR = 2.6, p = 0.05), and BPRS total score at baseline (OR = 1.05, p = 0.03) may help to predict akathisia emergence.

CONCLUSIONS

Among second generation antipsychotics, only olanzapine and quetiapine should be considered as akathisia-sparing drugs. The type of antipsychotic, having been hospitalized, and a more severe symptomatology at intake seem to predict the development of acute akathisia.

摘要

引言

急性静坐不能是一种神经精神综合征,对疾病结局有负面影响。在接受抗精神病药物治疗的患者中,其发生率在不同研究中表现出高度的可变性。

目的

我们的目标是在 493 名首发非情感性精神病患者的样本中,调查急性静坐不能的患病率、发展的危险因素以及抗精神病药物之间的发生率差异。

方法

这是三项前瞻性、随机、灵活剂量和开放标签临床试验的汇总分析。患者被随机分配到不同的治疗组(氟哌啶醇、喹硫平、奥氮平、齐拉西酮、利培酮或阿立哌唑)。在抗精神病药物起始后 6 周,使用巴恩斯静坐不能量表评估静坐不能。采用单变量分析来确定人口统计学、生化、物质使用、临床和治疗相关因素与急性静坐不能的关系。基于这些结果,我们构建了一个基于 132 名患者的亚样本的预测模型,将静坐不能作为因变量。

结果

静坐不能的总发生率为 19.5%。在人口统计学、生化、物质使用和临床变量方面没有差异。抗精神病药物之间观察到显著的发生率差异(Χ 2 = 68.21,p = 0.000):氟哌啶醇(57%)、利培酮(20%)、阿立哌唑(18.2%)、齐拉西酮(17.2%)、奥氮平(3.6%)和喹硫平(3.5%)。预测模型显示,抗精神病药物的类型(OR = 21.3,p = 0.000)、住院需求(OR = 2.6,p = 0.05)和基线时 BPRS 总分(OR = 1.05,p = 0.03)可能有助于预测静坐不能的发生。

结论

在第二代抗精神病药物中,只有奥氮平和喹硫平可被视为避免静坐不能的药物。抗精神病药物的类型、住院和入院时更严重的症状似乎可以预测急性静坐不能的发生。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验