Suppr超能文献

小阻力血管肥大的消退

Regression of hypertrophy in small resistance vessels.

作者信息

Sano T, Tarazi R C

机构信息

Research Division, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

J Hypertens Suppl. 1985 Dec;3(3):S489-91.

PMID:2856775
Abstract

Many studies have documented regression of left ventricular hypertrophy following blood pressure control by some antihypertensive agents but not by others. To determine whether similar differences in regression of wall thickening also occur in resistance vessels during treatment, matched control groups of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were treated for 12 weeks with either hydralazine or captopril + hydrochlorothiazide and compared with untreated SHR and Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY). Perfusion pressure was then determined in the hind-limbs of pithed rats under conditions of constant blood flow (4.0 ml/min) and maximal vasodilatation as an index of thickening (hypertrophy) of resistance vessel walls. Treatment with hydralazine or captopril + hydrochlorothiazide controlled blood pressure equally in SHR but had significantly different effects on both left ventricular hypertrophy and resistance vessels. Perfusion pressure was reduced from 37.4 +/- 0.5 mmHg to 33.9 +/- 0.5 mmHg (P < 0.01) with captopril + hydrochlorothiazide but only marginally to 35.9 +/- 0.3 mmHg with hydralazine (P < 0.05 at some levels of flow and P > 0.05 at others). Left ventricular weight was significantly reduced by captopril + hydrochlorothiazide (2.02 +/- 0.02 versus 2.63 +/- 0.05 mg/g, P < 0.01) but only to 2.44 +/- 0.05 by hydralazine. Significant correlations were found both before and following treatment between perfusion pressure and left ventricular weight (r = 0.59, P < 0.01) but not between either of these two parameters and arterial pressure. Thus, despite equal blood pressure control, thickening of resistance vessel walls regressed more with captopril + hydrochlorothiazide than with hydralazine, suggesting that vascular hypertrophy-like left ventricular hypertrophy is not determined by blood pressure levels alone.

摘要

许多研究记录了某些抗高血压药物控制血压后左心室肥厚的消退情况,但其他药物则不然。为了确定治疗期间阻力血管壁增厚的消退是否也存在类似差异,将匹配的自发性高血压大鼠(SHR)对照组分别用肼屈嗪或卡托普利+氢氯噻嗪治疗12周,并与未治疗的SHR和Wistar-Kyoto大鼠(WKY)进行比较。然后在血流恒定(4.0 ml/min)和最大血管舒张的条件下,测定去大脑大鼠后肢的灌注压,作为阻力血管壁增厚(肥大)的指标。肼屈嗪或卡托普利+氢氯噻嗪治疗在SHR中同样能控制血压,但对左心室肥厚和阻力血管的影响却有显著差异。卡托普利+氢氯噻嗪可使灌注压从37.4±0.5 mmHg降至33.9±0.5 mmHg(P<0.01),而肼屈嗪仅使其略微降至35.9±0.3 mmHg(在某些血流水平下P<0.05,在其他水平下P>0.05)。卡托普利+氢氯噻嗪可使左心室重量显著降低(2.02±0.02对2.63±0.05 mg/g,P<0.01),而肼屈嗪仅使其降至2.44±0.05。治疗前后,灌注压与左心室重量之间均存在显著相关性(r = 0.59,P<0.01),但这两个参数与动脉压之间均无相关性。因此,尽管血压得到了同等控制,但卡托普利+氢氯噻嗪比肼屈嗪更能使阻力血管壁增厚消退,这表明血管肥大与左心室肥大一样,并非仅由血压水平决定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验